PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRU vs. TAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRU vs. TAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRU achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly higher than TAP's -8.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PRU has outperformed TAP with an annualized return of 9.04%, while TAP has yielded a comparatively lower -6.04% annualized return.


PRU

1D
1.87%
1M
7.90%
YTD
-1.25%
6M
-4.69%
1Y
11.09%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
9.04%

TAP

1D
1.59%
1M
3.03%
YTD
-8.93%
6M
-10.69%
1Y
-14.29%
3Y*
-12.05%
5Y*
-4.02%
10Y*
-6.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRU vs. TAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
-1.25%0.18%19.46%10.09%-3.86%45.32%-11.40%20.10%-26.46%13.65%
TAP
Molson Coors Brewing Company
-8.93%-15.53%-3.43%22.15%14.39%4.12%-15.20%-0.44%-29.88%-14.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PRU and TAP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2001

0.36

The correlation between PRU and TAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRU:

$37.91B

TAP:

$7.88B

EPS

PRU:

$9.85

TAP:

-$10.76

PS Ratio

PRU:

0.80

TAP:

0.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRU:

$47.43B

TAP:

$11.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRU:

$14.72B

TAP:

$4.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRU:

$4.02B

TAP:

-$1.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRU vs. TAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRU
PRU Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PRU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRU Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PRU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRU Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

TAP
TAP Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAP Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRU vs. TAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRUTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.92

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

-0.57

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

-1.18

+2.10

PRU vs. TAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRU Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the TAP Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRU and TAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRU vs. TAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRU drawdown since its inception was -88.53%, which is greater than TAP's maximum drawdown of -67.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRU and TAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRUTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.53%

-67.73%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.46%

-27.75%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-39.73%

+14.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

-39.73%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.89%

-67.73%

+1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.47%

-51.73%

+42.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-22.80%

+4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.90%

13.49%

-3.59%

Volatility

PRU vs. TAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) is 6.05%, while Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that PRU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRUTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

7.28%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.48%

19.54%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.66%

26.09%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.83%

25.65%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.83%

28.50%

+3.33%

Dividends

PRU vs. TAP - Dividend Comparison

PRU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than TAP's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
5.07%4.78%4.39%4.82%4.83%4.25%5.64%4.27%4.41%2.61%2.69%3.00%
TAP
Molson Coors Brewing Company
4.57%4.03%3.07%2.68%2.95%1.47%1.26%3.64%2.92%2.00%1.69%1.75%

Financials

PRU vs. TAP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential Financial, Inc. and Molson Coors Brewing Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B202220232024202520260
2.35B
(PRU) Total Revenue
(TAP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PRU and TAP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAP has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to PRU (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRU dropped -88.53% vs TAP's -67.73%.

PRU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRU and TAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer