PortfoliosLab logo
TAP vs. STZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TAP and STZ is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

TAP vs. STZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TAP:

0.08

STZ:

-0.76

Sortino Ratio

TAP:

0.25

STZ:

-0.83

Omega Ratio

TAP:

1.03

STZ:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

TAP:

0.02

STZ:

-0.21

Martin Ratio

TAP:

0.12

STZ:

-1.10

Ulcer Index

TAP:

7.77%

STZ:

19.42%

Daily Std Dev

TAP:

25.86%

STZ:

29.06%

Max Drawdown

TAP:

-67.73%

STZ:

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

TAP:

-37.29%

STZ:

-99.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TAP:

$11.39B

STZ:

$33.94B

EPS

TAP:

$4.97

STZ:

-$0.45

PEG Ratio

TAP:

22.26

STZ:

1.30

PS Ratio

TAP:

1.00

STZ:

3.33

PB Ratio

TAP:

0.87

STZ:

4.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

TAP:

$11.33B

STZ:

$10.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TAP:

$4.35B

STZ:

$5.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

TAP:

$2.49B

STZ:

$774.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAP achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than STZ's -10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TAP has underperformed STZ with an annualized return of -0.53%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.54% annualized return.


TAP

YTD

-0.06%

1M

-3.17%

6M

-7.57%

1Y

2.11%

5Y*

11.82%

10Y*

-0.53%

STZ

YTD

-10.47%

1M

7.47%

6M

-16.69%

1Y

-21.87%

5Y*

5.93%

10Y*

6.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TAP vs. STZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TAP is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TAP is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TAP is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TAP is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TAP is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TAP is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

STZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STZ is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STZ is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STZ is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STZ is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STZ is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STZ is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TAP vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TAP Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the STZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAP and STZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

TAP vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison

TAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than STZ's 2.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TAP
Molson Coors Brewing Company
3.15%3.07%2.68%2.95%1.47%1.26%3.64%2.92%2.00%1.69%1.75%1.99%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
2.07%1.77%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%0.00%

Drawdowns

TAP vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAP drawdown since its inception was -67.73%, smaller than the maximum STZ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAP and STZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TAP vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison

Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 4.79%. This indicates that TAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TAP vs. STZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Molson Coors Brewing Company and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
2.30B
2.16B
(TAP) Total Revenue
(STZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TAP vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Molson Coors Brewing Company and Constellation Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20212022202320242025
36.9%
51.5%
(TAP) Gross Margin
(STZ) Gross Margin
TAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Molson Coors Brewing Company reported a gross profit of 850.90M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

STZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.5%.

TAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Molson Coors Brewing Company reported an operating income of 186.30M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

STZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -150.30M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.

TAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Molson Coors Brewing Company reported a net income of 121.00M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

STZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -375.30M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.