PRTO vs. NANC
PRTO (RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF) and NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRTO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Tidal, while NANC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PRTO charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for NANC.
Performance
PRTO vs. NANC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRTO
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NANC
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 19.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $826.89K | $806.25K | $1.03M | |
| $107.30K | $60.42K | $45.96K |
PRTO vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRTO RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF | 6.83% |
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 17.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRTO and NANC is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRTO vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank
PRTO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NANC
PRTO vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRTO | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRTO vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRTO drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum NANC drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRTO and NANC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRTO | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -20.94% | +16.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -1.72% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -2.64% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility
PRTO vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRTO | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 14.96% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 16.81% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 16.81% | -1.63% |
PRTO vs. NANC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRTO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than NANC's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRTO vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison
PRTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.94% |
PRTO RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRTO and NANC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NANC is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NANC is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for PRTO.
NANC has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for PRTO.
PRTO is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while NANC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for PRTO and 0.72% for NANC.
Find the right allocation for PRTO and NANC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer