PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRTO vs. GRNI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRTO vs. GRNI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PRTO

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.88%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRNI

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.46%
YTD
9.53%
6M
8.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRTO vs. GRNI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRTO and GRNI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026

0.86

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRTO vs. GRNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRTO vs. GRNI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRTOGRNIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.77

1.45

+3.32

Drawdowns

PRTO vs. GRNI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRTO drawdown since its inception was -2.98%, smaller than the maximum GRNI drawdown of -9.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRTO and GRNI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRTOGRNIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-9.55%

+6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.70%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-2.12%

+1.57%

Volatility

PRTO vs. GRNI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRTOGRNIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.03%

17.34%

-3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

17.34%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.03%

17.34%

-3.31%

PRTO vs. GRNI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRTO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNI's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRTO vs. GRNI - Dividend Comparison

PRTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRTO and GRNI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRTO is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRTO is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GRNI.

GRNI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.00% for PRTO.

PRTO is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while GRNI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for PRTO and 0.99% for GRNI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRTO and GRNI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer