PRTO vs. GDT
PRTO (RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRTO charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
PRTO vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRTO
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRTO vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRTO RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF | 8.12% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRTO and GDT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRTO vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRTO vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRTO drawdown since its inception was -4.46%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRTO and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRTO | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.46% | -22.61% | +18.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -22.49% | +20.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -11.03% | +10.19% |
Volatility
PRTO vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRTO | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 32.99% | -16.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 32.99% | -16.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 32.99% | -16.74% |
PRTO vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRTO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRTO vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
PRTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.91% |
PRTO RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRTO and GDT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for PRTO.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for PRTO.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for PRTO and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for PRTO and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer