PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRT vs. PBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRT vs. PBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PermRock Royalty Trust (PRT) and Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRT achieves a -23.88% return, which is significantly lower than PBT's 71.24% return.


PRT

1D
-1.41%
1M
-25.43%
YTD
-23.88%
6M
-44.67%
1Y
-43.10%
3Y*
-15.18%
5Y*
-12.84%
10Y*

PBT

1D
-0.21%
1M
23.95%
YTD
71.24%
6M
60.33%
1Y
165.80%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
50.39%
10Y*
21.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRT vs. PBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PRT
PermRock Royalty Trust
-23.88%-12.79%-11.58%-37.64%24.09%194.55%-49.26%-0.27%-57.76%
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
71.24%56.75%-16.91%-42.84%166.22%218.45%-7.68%-29.15%-36.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PRT and PBT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2018

0.25

The correlation between PRT and PBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PRT:

$0.43

PBT:

$0.33

PE Ratio

PRT:

4.92

PBT:

86.35

PS Ratio

PRT:

4.22

PBT:

77.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRT:

$4.54M

PBT:

$13.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRT:

$3.88M

PBT:

$13.06M

EBITDA (TTM)

PRT:

$3.25M

PBT:

$11.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRT vs. PBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRT
PRT Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRT Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

PBT
PBT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRT vs. PBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PermRock Royalty Trust (PRT) and Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRTPBTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.20

3.97

-5.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.75

4.48

-6.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.55

-0.77

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

8.76

-9.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.43

24.75

-27.18

PRT vs. PBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRT Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the PBT Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRT and PBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRTPBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.20

3.97

-5.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

1.06

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.34

-0.58

Drawdowns

PRT vs. PBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRT drawdown since its inception was -91.42%, which is greater than PBT's maximum drawdown of -83.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRT and PBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRTPBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.42%

-83.17%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.54%

-19.04%

-34.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.13%

-62.52%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.28%

-65.05%

-9.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.87%

-6.71%

-67.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.92%

-25.68%

-23.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.72%

6.73%

+10.99%

Volatility

PRT vs. PBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PermRock Royalty Trust (PRT) is 16.81%, while Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) has a volatility of 21.71%. This indicates that PRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRTPBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.81%

21.71%

-4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.14%

31.21%

+2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.92%

42.08%

-6.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.16%

47.80%

-6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.36%

42.78%

+17.58%

Dividends

PRT vs. PBT - Dividend Comparison

PRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, more than PBT's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
1.23%1.92%4.92%4.30%4.56%2.28%7.10%10.80%11.20%7.09%5.38%6.81%
PRT
PermRock Royalty Trust
11.85%13.88%12.05%11.65%13.12%8.66%6.01%13.50%21.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PRT vs. PBT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PermRock Royalty Trust and Permian Basin Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00M20222023202420252026
656.97K
0
(PRT) Total Revenue
(PBT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PRT and PBT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBT has higher volatility (21.71%) compared to PRT (16.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRT dropped -91.42% vs PBT's -83.17%.

PBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRT and PBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer