PortfoliosLab logo
PBT vs. PVL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PBT and PVL is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PBT vs. PVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) and Permianville Royalty Trust (PVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PBT:

-0.38

PVL:

0.20

Sortino Ratio

PBT:

-0.31

PVL:

0.84

Omega Ratio

PBT:

0.96

PVL:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

PBT:

-0.24

PVL:

0.16

Martin Ratio

PBT:

-0.84

PVL:

0.70

Ulcer Index

PBT:

18.33%

PVL:

17.71%

Daily Std Dev

PBT:

39.48%

PVL:

50.68%

Max Drawdown

PBT:

-83.08%

PVL:

-90.33%

Current Drawdown

PBT:

-57.59%

PVL:

-62.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PBT:

$489.86M

PVL:

$50.49M

EPS

PBT:

$0.54

PVL:

$0.09

PE Ratio

PBT:

19.28

PVL:

17.00

PS Ratio

PBT:

18.07

PVL:

11.64

PB Ratio

PBT:

2.95K

PVL:

1.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

PBT:

$21.07M

PVL:

$4.11M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PBT:

$21.07M

PVL:

$3.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

PBT:

$19.92M

PVL:

$3.02M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBT achieves a -3.00% return, which is significantly lower than PVL's 15.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PBT has outperformed PVL with an annualized return of 7.93%, while PVL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.83% annualized return.


PBT

YTD

-3.00%

1M

13.02%

6M

-15.66%

1Y

-15.03%

5Y*

32.51%

10Y*

7.93%

PVL

YTD

15.37%

1M

6.85%

6M

1.94%

1Y

10.11%

5Y*

12.89%

10Y*

5.83%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PBT vs. PVL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PBT is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PBT is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PBT is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PBT is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PBT is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PBT is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PVL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PVL is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PVL is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PVL is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PVL is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PVL is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PVL is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PBT vs. PVL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) and Permianville Royalty Trust (PVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PBT Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the PVL Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBT and PVL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PBT vs. PVL - Dividend Comparison

PBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than PVL's 6.09% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
3.90%4.92%4.30%4.56%2.28%7.10%10.83%11.20%7.09%5.40%6.82%10.73%
PVL
Permianville Royalty Trust
6.09%6.32%30.56%13.25%7.63%18.46%16.59%22.23%79.59%7.01%15.68%16.51%

Drawdowns

PBT vs. PVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBT drawdown since its inception was -83.08%, smaller than the maximum PVL drawdown of -90.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBT and PVL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PBT vs. PVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) is 9.57%, while Permianville Royalty Trust (PVL) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that PBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PBT vs. PVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Permian Basin Royalty Trust and Permianville Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M30.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
3.82M
1.68M
(PBT) Total Revenue
(PVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PBT vs. PVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Permian Basin Royalty Trust and Permianville Royalty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
100.0%
87.4%
(PBT) Gross Margin
(PVL) Gross Margin
PBT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Permian Basin Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 3.82M and revenue of 3.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Permianville Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 1.47M and revenue of 1.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.4%.

PBT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Permian Basin Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 3.43M and revenue of 3.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 90.0%.

PVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Permianville Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 1.16M and revenue of 1.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 69.1%.

PBT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Permian Basin Royalty Trust reported a net income of 3.43M and revenue of 3.82M, resulting in a net margin of 90.0%.

PVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Permianville Royalty Trust reported a net income of 1.30M and revenue of 1.68M, resulting in a net margin of 77.4%.