PRT vs. CRT
PRT (PermRock Royalty Trust) and CRT (Cross Timbers Royalty Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 5 years, PRT returned -12.21%/yr vs 4.93%/yr for CRT. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PRT vs. CRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRT achieves a -19.45% return, which is significantly lower than CRT's 32.43% return.
PRT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -5.89%
- 6M
- -36.14%
- YTD
- -19.45%
- 1Y
- -41.77%
- 3Y*
- -23.23%
- 5Y*
- -12.21%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.83%
CRT
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- YTD
- 32.43%
- 1Y
- 21.82%
- 3Y*
- -14.68%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $142.29K | $133.91K | $199.67K | |
| $61.06K | $82.11K | $142.65K |
PRT vs. CRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRT PermRock Royalty Trust | -19.45% | -12.79% | -11.58% | -37.64% | 24.09% | 194.55% | -49.26% | -0.27% | -59.08% |
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 32.43% | -13.15% | -39.15% | -24.36% | 145.90% | 53.31% | 5.38% | -13.04% | -12.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRT and CRT is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2018 | 0.24 |
The correlation between PRT and CRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PRT:
$26.40M
CRT:
$61.32M
PRT:
$0.48
CRT:
$0.54
PRT:
4.52
CRT:
19.10
PRT:
3.88
CRT:
13.63
PRT:
$4.54M
CRT:
$4.50M
PRT:
$3.88M
CRT:
$4.33M
PRT:
$3.25M
CRT:
$3.36M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRT vs. CRT — Risk / Return Rank
PRT
CRT
PRT vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PermRock Royalty Trust (PRT) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRT | CRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.13 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 0.88 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.74 | 2.10 | -3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRT vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRT drawdown since its inception was -91.42%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRT and CRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRT | CRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.42% | -83.57% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.95% | -21.63% | -31.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.13% | -63.52% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.28% | -71.10% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.35% | -55.78% | -16.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -29.52% | -19.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.23% | 9.82% | +14.41% |
Volatility
PRT vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison
PermRock Royalty Trust (PRT) has a higher volatility of 15.92% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 8.82%. This indicates that PRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRT | CRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.92% | 8.82% | +7.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.77% | 22.39% | +11.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.02% | 33.03% | +6.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.58% | 50.11% | -8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.13% | 46.09% | +14.04% |
Dividends
PRT vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison
PRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.37%, more than CRT's 5.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 5.49% | 9.41% | 9.56% | 10.96% | 7.69% | 9.71% | 9.45% | 10.04% | 13.06% | 6.87% | 5.90% | 10.41% |
PRT PermRock Royalty Trust | 10.37% | 13.88% | 12.05% | 11.65% | 13.12% | 8.66% | 6.01% | 13.50% | 21.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PRT vs. CRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PermRock Royalty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PRT vs. CRT - Profitability Comparison
PRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PermRock Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 656.97K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 754.63K and revenue of 787.85K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.
PRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PermRock Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 656.97K, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in an operating margin of 63.9%.
PRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PermRock Royalty Trust reported a net income of 647.43K and revenue of 656.97K, resulting in a net margin of 98.6%.
CRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in a net margin of 63.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRT and CRT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRT has higher volatility (15.92%) compared to CRT (8.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRT dropped -91.42% vs CRT's -83.57%.
CRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRT and CRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer