PRSCX vs. NVLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX).
PRSCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 29, 1987. NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009.
Performance
PRSCX vs. NVLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRSCX vs. NVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRSCX T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund | -11.17% | 24.28% | 40.49% | 53.77% | -35.40% | 5.83% | 45.94% | 53.80% | -7.52% | 39.38% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -14.74% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRSCX achieves a -11.17% return, which is significantly higher than NVLIX's -14.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PRSCX has outperformed NVLIX with an annualized return of 18.39%, while NVLIX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.06% annualized return.
PRSCX
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -13.60%
- YTD
- -11.17%
- 6M
- -8.13%
- 1Y
- 30.89%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 18.39%
NVLIX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -14.74%
- 6M
- -14.11%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRSCX vs. NVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRSCX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than NVLIX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRSCX vs. NVLIX — Risk / Return Rank
PRSCX
NVLIX
PRSCX vs. NVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRSCX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.29 | +0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 0.58 | +1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.08 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 0.15 | +1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 0.49 | +4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRSCX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.29 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.42 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.69 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.73 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRSCX and NVLIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRSCX vs. NVLIX - Dividend Comparison
PRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.97%, less than NVLIX's 26.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRSCX T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund | 12.97% | 11.53% | 9.43% | 0.00% | 7.83% | 33.69% | 13.90% | 10.91% | 36.03% | 13.21% | 3.68% | 18.51% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 26.33% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
Drawdowns
PRSCX vs. NVLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRSCX drawdown since its inception was -85.26%, which is greater than NVLIX's maximum drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRSCX and NVLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRSCX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.26% | -39.57% | -45.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.99% | -19.01% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.19% | -39.57% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.19% | -39.57% | -6.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.99% | -19.01% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.02% | -6.20% | -23.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.37% | 5.81% | -0.44% |
Volatility
PRSCX vs. NVLIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) at 5.48%. This indicates that PRSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRSCX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.82% | 5.48% | +3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.49% | 12.08% | +5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.29% | 22.64% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.36% | 22.35% | +5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 21.97% | +2.53% |