PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRSCX vs. PRGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRSCX vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRSCX achieves a 38.20% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's 42.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PRSCX has outperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 23.27%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 19.45% annualized return.


PRSCX

1D
1.63%
1M
18.89%
YTD
38.20%
6M
35.62%
1Y
82.13%
3Y*
39.23%
5Y*
17.88%
10Y*
23.27%

PRGTX

1D
2.83%
1M
19.26%
YTD
42.26%
6M
41.99%
1Y
79.69%
3Y*
39.44%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
19.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRSCX vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRSCX
T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund
38.20%24.28%40.49%53.77%-35.40%5.83%45.94%53.80%-7.52%39.38%
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
42.26%27.28%33.12%55.92%-55.53%8.85%75.77%34.22%-10.07%47.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PRSCX and PRGTX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.94

The correlation between PRSCX and PRGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRSCX vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRSCX
PRSCX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PRSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGTX
PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRSCX vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRSCXPRGTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.73

3.55

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.33

4.16

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.58

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

6.15

-1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.49

19.42

-1.93

PRSCX vs. PRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRSCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is comparable to the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRSCX and PRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRSCXPRGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73

3.55

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.36

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.69

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.47

+0.05

Drawdowns

PRSCX vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRSCX drawdown since its inception was -85.26%, which is greater than PRGTX's maximum drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRSCX and PRGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRSCXPRGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.26%

-71.18%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.99%

-13.06%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.06%

-26.67%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.19%

-65.29%

+19.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.19%

-65.29%

+19.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-21.54%

-8.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

4.13%

+0.62%

Volatility

PRSCX vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) at 8.25%. This indicates that PRSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRSCXPRGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.33%

8.25%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.83%

18.67%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.77%

23.13%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.80%

31.79%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.80%

28.39%

-3.59%

PRSCX vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRSCX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGTX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRSCX vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison

PRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, while PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.28%27.71%5.05%0.15%24.67%15.81%9.46%10.03%
PRSCX
T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund
8.34%11.53%9.43%0.00%7.83%33.69%13.90%10.91%36.03%13.21%3.68%18.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRSCX and PRGTX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRSCX has higher volatility (9.33%) compared to PRGTX (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRSCX dropped -85.26% vs PRGTX's -71.18%.

PRSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 3.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRSCX and PRGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer