PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVLIX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVLIX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NVLIX having a 9.30% return and SWLGX slightly lower at 9.01%.


NVLIX

1D
0.98%
1M
8.08%
YTD
9.30%
6M
8.36%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*
17.75%

SWLGX

1D
0.74%
1M
7.30%
YTD
9.01%
6M
8.27%
1Y
28.78%
3Y*
25.70%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVLIX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVLIX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I
9.30%12.76%29.48%43.60%-31.31%27.62%37.97%33.54%3.02%-0.68%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
9.01%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NVLIX and SWLGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.97

The correlation between NVLIX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVLIX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVLIX
NVLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NVLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NVLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVLIX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVLIXSWLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

1.93

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

2.60

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.83

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.85

6.16

-2.31

NVLIX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVLIX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVLIXSWLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.93

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.74

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.80

0.00

Drawdowns

NVLIX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVLIX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVLIXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.57%

-32.69%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.01%

-16.16%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.94%

-23.30%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.57%

-32.69%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-7.06%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

4.80%

+1.33%

Volatility

NVLIX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 3.23%. This indicates that NVLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVLIXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

3.23%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

11.59%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.10%

15.43%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.36%

21.49%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.04%

22.68%

-0.64%

NVLIX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVLIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVLIX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

NVLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.54%, more than SWLGX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVLIX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I
20.54%22.45%14.35%5.39%8.93%9.51%5.47%8.69%18.81%18.70%17.11%15.18%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.42%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, NVLIX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NVLIX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to SWLGX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVLIX dropped -39.57% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVLIX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer