NVLIX vs. FDGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX).
NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009. FDGRX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
NVLIX vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NVLIX vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -11.60% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | -2.70% | 18.54% | 37.18% | 47.25% | -33.86% | 22.57% | 67.42% | 38.40% | -4.14% | 36.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVLIX achieves a -11.60% return, which is significantly lower than FDGRX's -2.70% return. Over the past 10 years, NVLIX has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 15.48%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.34% annualized return.
NVLIX
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- -11.60%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
FDGRX
- 1D
- 4.47%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- 31.14%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 20.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NVLIX vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVLIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NVLIX vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank
NVLIX
FDGRX
NVLIX vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVLIX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 1.31 | -0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 1.88 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.27 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 2.12 | -1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 7.42 | -6.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVLIX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.31 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.53 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.88 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.67 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between NVLIX and FDGRX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NVLIX vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison
NVLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.40%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 25.40% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.86% | 3.83% | 7.20% | 10.67% | 8.86% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.16% | 3.92% |
Drawdowns
NVLIX vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVLIX and FDGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVLIX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -71.62% | +32.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.01% | -13.07% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | -40.25% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.57% | -40.25% | +0.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.03% | -8.69% | -7.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -15.97% | +9.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 3.74% | +2.06% |
Volatility
NVLIX vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) is 6.85%, while Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that NVLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NVLIX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 8.21% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 15.30% | -2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.89% | 24.68% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 23.97% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 23.33% | -1.34% |