NVLIX vs. TRBCX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NVLIX (Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I) and TRBCX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NVLIX returned 16.91%/yr vs 16.56%/yr for TRBCX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. NVLIX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TRBCX.

Performance

NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVLIX achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's -1.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NVLIX having a 16.91% annualized return and TRBCX not far behind at 16.56%.

NVLIX

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: 7.28%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 10.88%
• 3Y*: 19.48%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: 16.91%
• ALL TIME*: 16.11%

TRBCX

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -0.95%
• 6M: -0.12%
• YTD: -1.84%
• 1Y: 6.79%
• 3Y*: 23.00%
• 5Y*: 10.10%
• 10Y*: 16.56%
• ALL TIME*: 12.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I	4.99%	12.76%	29.48%	43.60%	-31.31%	27.62%	37.97%	33.54%	3.02%	33.09%
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	-1.84%	18.78%	48.46%	49.42%	-38.57%	17.54%	34.73%	29.97%	2.00%	36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NVLIX and TRBCX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2009	0.97

The correlation between NVLIX and TRBCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVLIX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVLIX

NVLIX Risk / Return Rank: 10
NVLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
NVLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
NVLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
NVLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
NVLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

TRBCX

TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 7
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVLIX	TRBCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	0.24	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	0.45	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.05	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	0.26	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.32	0.78	+0.54

NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVLIX and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVLIX and TRBCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVLIX	TRBCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.57%	-54.56%	+14.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.01%	-17.01%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.94%	-23.08%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.57%	-43.63%	+4.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.57%	-43.63%	+4.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.13%	-7.58%	+3.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-11.28%	+5.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.33%	5.67%	+0.66%

Volatility

NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) have volatilities of 6.01% and 6.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVLIX	TRBCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.01%	6.15%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.49%	15.49%	-1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.24%	18.64%	-0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.67%	24.27%	-1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.17%	22.89%	-0.72%

NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVLIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

NVLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.38%, more than TRBCX's 5.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I	21.38%	22.45%	14.35%	5.39%	8.93%	9.51%	5.47%	8.69%	18.81%	18.70%	17.11%	15.18%
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	5.34%	5.25%	18.16%	3.49%	5.87%	9.38%	1.19%	0.36%	2.44%	2.94%	0.67%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVLIX and TRBCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, NVLIX and TRBCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NVLIX or TRBCX?

TRBCX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to NVLIX (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVLIX dropped -39.57% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.