NVLIX vs. TRBCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX).
NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009. TRBCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993.
Performance
NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -14.74% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | -14.57% | 18.78% | 48.46% | 49.42% | -38.57% | 17.54% | 34.73% | 29.97% | 2.00% | 36.54% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVLIX having a -14.74% return and TRBCX slightly higher at -14.57%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NVLIX having a 15.06% annualized return and TRBCX not far ahead at 15.42%.
NVLIX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -14.74%
- 6M
- -14.11%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
TRBCX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.85%
- YTD
- -14.57%
- 6M
- -12.81%
- 1Y
- 11.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVLIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NVLIX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank
NVLIX
TRBCX
NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVLIX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | 0.51 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.58 | 0.89 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.13 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 0.49 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | 1.72 | -1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVLIX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 0.51 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.42 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.68 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.57 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between NVLIX and TRBCX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison
NVLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.33%, more than TRBCX's 6.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 26.33% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | 6.14% | 5.25% | 18.16% | 3.49% | 5.87% | 9.38% | 1.19% | 0.36% | 2.44% | 2.94% | 0.67% | 3.26% |
Drawdowns
NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVLIX and TRBCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVLIX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -54.56% | +14.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.01% | -17.01% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | -43.63% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.57% | -43.63% | +4.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.01% | -17.01% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -11.35% | +5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 4.86% | +0.95% |
Volatility
NVLIX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) have volatilities of 5.48% and 5.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NVLIX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 5.58% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 13.15% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.64% | 23.22% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 24.00% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 22.73% | -0.76% |