PRRSX vs. VOO
PRRSX (PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - PRRSX is a REIT fund managed by PIMCO, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, PRRSX returned 6.56%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRRSX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
PRRSX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRRSX achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PRRSX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.56%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.
PRRSX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 17.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.56%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
PRRSX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 13.87% | 5.21% | 5.11% | 12.30% | -29.37% | 53.74% | -3.80% | 29.61% | -6.42% | 4.32% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRRSX and VOO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PRRSX and VOO has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRRSX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
PRRSX
VOO
PRRSX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRRSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.39 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 3.02 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 13.58 | -6.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRRSX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRRSX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRSX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRRSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -33.99% | -43.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -8.90% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.77% | -18.69% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.14% | -24.52% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.75% | -33.99% | -11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -1.74% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.06% | -3.68% | -9.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 1.98% | +0.66% |
Volatility
PRRSX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that PRRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRRSX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.60% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 9.73% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 12.39% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 16.90% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 18.05% | +3.85% |
PRRSX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRRSX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRRSX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
PRRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 1.51% | 2.19% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 18.62% | 34.01% | 7.21% | 7.99% | 0.81% | 1.67% | 0.66% | 8.38% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRRSX and VOO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRRSX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRSX dropped -77.82% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRRSX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer