PRRSX vs. IRFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX).
PRRSX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Oct 30, 2003. IRFIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Mar 30, 2005.
Performance
PRRSX vs. IRFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRRSX vs. IRFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 2.41% | 5.21% | 5.11% | 12.30% | -29.37% | 53.74% | -3.80% | 29.61% | -6.42% | 4.32% |
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | -4.81% | 23.52% | -10.56% | 4.58% | -23.84% | 7.66% | -0.81% | 23.74% | -3.74% | 23.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRRSX achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly higher than IRFIX's -4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PRRSX has outperformed IRFIX with an annualized return of 5.61%, while IRFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.
PRRSX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.61%
IRFIX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -14.45%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRRSX vs. IRFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRRSX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IRFIX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRRSX vs. IRFIX — Risk / Return Rank
PRRSX
IRFIX
PRRSX vs. IRFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRRSX | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 0.99 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 1.37 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.19 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.86 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | 3.90 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRRSX | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.99 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | -0.14 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.16 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.18 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRRSX and IRFIX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PRRSX vs. IRFIX - Dividend Comparison
PRRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than IRFIX's 6.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 0.87% | 2.19% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 18.62% | 34.01% | 7.21% | 7.99% | 0.81% | 1.67% | 0.66% | 8.38% |
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | 6.48% | 6.17% | 3.24% | 2.62% | 2.62% | 7.70% | 3.40% | 9.81% | 4.19% | 3.37% | 6.46% | 3.36% |
Drawdowns
PRRSX vs. IRFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRRSX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than IRFIX's maximum drawdown of -70.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRSX and IRFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRRSX | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -70.13% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -14.85% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.14% | -38.41% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.75% | -39.51% | -6.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -20.71% | +10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.18% | -18.69% | +5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 3.29% | +0.03% |
Volatility
PRRSX vs. IRFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) is 4.65%, while Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that PRRSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRRSX | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 5.06% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 9.13% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.82% | 13.55% | +4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 15.12% | +5.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.86% | 15.59% | +6.27% |