PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRSX vs. HLRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRSX vs. HLRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PRRSX having a 12.55% return and HLRRX slightly lower at 12.31%. Over the past 10 years, PRRSX has outperformed HLRRX with an annualized return of 6.61%, while HLRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.45% annualized return.


PRRSX

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
12.55%
6M
10.90%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
11.11%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
6.61%

HLRRX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
12.31%
6M
10.57%
1Y
10.17%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
4.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRRSX vs. HLRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
12.55%5.21%5.11%12.30%-29.37%53.74%-3.80%29.61%-6.42%4.32%
HLRRX
LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund
12.31%-9.13%9.45%10.50%-21.40%40.50%-3.78%31.75%-13.63%-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRSX and HLRRX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.84

The correlation between PRRSX and HLRRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRSX vs. HLRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

HLRRX
HLRRX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
HLRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
HLRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRRSX vs. HLRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRRSXHLRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.55

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.34

3.52

+2.82

PRRSX vs. HLRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the HLRRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRSX and HLRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRRSXHLRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.85

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.09

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.21

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.33

+0.01

Drawdowns

PRRSX vs. HLRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRSX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than HLRRX's maximum drawdown of -62.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRSX and HLRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRSXHLRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-62.78%

-15.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-6.72%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

-21.04%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.14%

-28.99%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.75%

-48.13%

+2.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-5.33%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.09%

-8.50%

-4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.95%

-0.33%

Volatility

PRRSX vs. HLRRX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) at 2.56%. This indicates that PRRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRSXHLRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

2.56%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

8.03%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

12.32%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.20%

17.42%

+2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.86%

20.81%

+1.05%

PRRSX vs. HLRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRSX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than HLRRX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRRSX vs. HLRRX - Dividend Comparison

PRRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than HLRRX's 9.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLRRX
LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund
9.75%9.39%4.93%5.50%13.71%17.02%9.10%2.44%2.68%17.61%15.94%10.13%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
0.79%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRRSX and HLRRX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRRSX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to HLRRX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRSX dropped -77.82% vs HLRRX's -62.78%.

PRRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRSX and HLRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer