HLRRX vs. CSZIX
Compare and contrast key facts about LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX).
HLRRX is managed by REMSGroup. It was launched on Dec 16, 2002. CSZIX is an actively managed fund by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Oct 1, 2014.
Performance
HLRRX vs. CSZIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLRRX vs. CSZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 5.63% | -9.13% | 9.45% | 10.50% | -21.40% | 40.50% | -3.78% | 31.75% | -13.63% | -1.24% |
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 2.42% | 4.41% | 6.81% | 13.26% | -26.21% | 41.81% | -1.64% | 31.95% | -4.17% | 8.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLRRX achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly higher than CSZIX's 2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, HLRRX has underperformed CSZIX with an annualized return of 4.18%, while CSZIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.51% annualized return.
HLRRX
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.18%
CSZIX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -6.81%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLRRX vs. CSZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLRRX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than CSZIX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLRRX vs. CSZIX — Risk / Return Rank
HLRRX
CSZIX
HLRRX vs. CSZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLRRX | CSZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | 0.22 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | 0.40 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.05 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 0.36 | -0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 1.43 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLRRX | CSZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 0.22 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.23 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.31 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.33 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLRRX and CSZIX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HLRRX vs. CSZIX - Dividend Comparison
HLRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than CSZIX's 3.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 7.60% | 9.39% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 13.71% | 17.02% | 9.10% | 2.44% | 2.68% | 17.61% | 15.94% | 10.13% |
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 3.07% | 3.81% | 2.85% | 3.00% | 7.77% | 4.38% | 5.47% | 7.70% | 3.68% | 2.60% | 5.90% | 22.32% |
Drawdowns
HLRRX vs. CSZIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLRRX drawdown since its inception was -62.78%, which is greater than CSZIX's maximum drawdown of -42.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLRRX and CSZIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLRRX | CSZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.78% | -42.71% | -20.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.74% | -11.83% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -33.05% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.13% | -42.71% | -5.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.96% | -6.81% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -8.88% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 2.99% | +1.35% |
Volatility
HLRRX vs. CSZIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) is 4.14%, while Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that HLRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLRRX | CSZIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 4.41% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 9.43% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.60% | 15.96% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 18.67% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 20.80% | +0.01% |