PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLRRX vs. FIKLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLRRX vs. FIKLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) and Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLRRX achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than FIKLX's -4.00% return.


HLRRX

1D
0.79%
1M
1.19%
YTD
15.25%
6M
16.52%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
5.01%

FIKLX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-4.00%
6M
-3.72%
1Y
2.03%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
-3.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLRRX vs. FIKLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HLRRX
LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund
15.25%-9.13%9.45%10.50%-21.40%40.50%-3.78%31.75%-7.84%
FIKLX
Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z
-4.00%22.93%-9.39%4.32%-26.54%12.03%5.85%28.22%-2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between HLRRX and FIKLX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.53

The correlation between HLRRX and FIKLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLRRX vs. FIKLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLRRX
HLRRX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
HLRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HLRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKLX
FIKLX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FIKLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKLX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKLX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLRRX vs. FIKLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) and Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLRRXFIKLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.05

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

0.19

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

0.46

+3.78

HLRRX vs. FIKLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLRRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the FIKLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLRRX and FIKLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLRRX vs. FIKLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLRRX drawdown since its inception was -62.78%, which is greater than FIKLX's maximum drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLRRX and FIKLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLRRXFIKLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.78%

-36.93%

-25.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-14.03%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.04%

-18.09%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.99%

-36.93%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-20.30%

+17.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-15.74%

+7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

5.78%

-2.82%

Volatility

HLRRX vs. FIKLX - Volatility Comparison

LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) and Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLRRXFIKLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.37%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

9.97%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

12.14%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

13.70%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

14.71%

+6.11%

HLRRX vs. FIKLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLRRX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKLX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLRRX vs. FIKLX - Dividend Comparison

HLRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, more than FIKLX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKLX
Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z
3.22%3.10%5.24%2.12%4.60%5.63%1.94%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HLRRX
LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund
9.50%9.39%4.93%5.50%13.71%17.02%9.10%2.44%2.68%17.61%15.94%10.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLRRX and FIKLX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLRRX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to FIKLX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLRRX dropped -62.78% vs FIKLX's -36.93%.

HLRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLRRX and FIKLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer