PRPFX vs. BOGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) and Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX).
PRPFX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Nov 30, 1982. BOGSX is managed by Oak Associates. It was launched on Dec 28, 2000.
Performance
PRPFX vs. BOGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRPFX vs. BOGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 2.72% | 28.78% | 19.36% | 11.96% | -5.48% | 10.87% | 18.80% | 19.20% | -7.02% | 11.42% |
BOGSX Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund | -1.72% | 19.06% | 9.25% | 17.79% | -27.30% | 26.89% | 45.16% | 38.20% | -4.94% | 19.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRPFX achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly higher than BOGSX's -1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PRPFX has underperformed BOGSX with an annualized return of 10.84%, while BOGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.
PRPFX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
BOGSX
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -6.64%
- YTD
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 24.96%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRPFX vs. BOGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRPFX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than BOGSX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRPFX vs. BOGSX — Risk / Return Rank
PRPFX
BOGSX
PRPFX vs. BOGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) and Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRPFX | BOGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 0.95 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 1.47 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.20 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 1.65 | +1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.17 | 5.85 | +5.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRPFX | BOGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 0.95 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.21 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 0.57 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.06 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRPFX and BOGSX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PRPFX vs. BOGSX - Dividend Comparison
PRPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than BOGSX's 5.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 3.18% | 3.27% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 2.05% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 0.95% | 7.06% |
BOGSX Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund | 5.86% | 5.76% | 7.96% | 3.79% | 1.87% | 11.31% | 6.30% | 5.47% | 11.71% | 7.71% | 4.00% | 3.09% |
Drawdowns
PRPFX vs. BOGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRPFX drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, smaller than the maximum BOGSX drawdown of -92.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRPFX and BOGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRPFX | BOGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -92.80% | +65.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -12.77% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.49% | -33.93% | +18.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.84% | -33.93% | +13.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -10.20% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -59.36% | +55.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 3.60% | -1.38% |
Volatility
PRPFX vs. BOGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) is 3.59%, while Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that PRPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRPFX | BOGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 7.10% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 16.64% | -5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.77% | 25.96% | -12.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.04% | 25.14% | -14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.57% | 24.44% | -13.87% |