BOGSX vs. ASML

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML).

BOGSX is managed by Oak Associates. It was launched on Dec 28, 2000.

Performance

BOGSX vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOGSX vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOGSX Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund	-1.72%	19.06%	9.25%	17.79%	-27.30%	26.89%	45.16%	38.20%	-4.94%	19.05%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	23.62%	56.51%	-7.70%	39.91%	-30.49%	64.13%	66.06%	93.56%	-9.80%	56.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOGSX achieves a -1.72% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 23.62% return. Over the past 10 years, BOGSX has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 13.86%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 30.71% annualized return.

BOGSX

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -6.64%
• YTD: -1.72%
• 6M: -0.71%
• 1Y: 24.96%
• 3Y*: 10.34%
• 5Y*: 5.28%
• 10Y*: 13.86%

ASML

• 1D: 5.33%
• 1M: -8.94%
• YTD: 23.62%
• 6M: 36.86%
• 1Y: 101.57%
• 3Y*: 26.02%
• 5Y*: 16.89%
• 10Y*: 30.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BOGSX vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOGSX

BOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 57
BOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
BOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
BOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

ASML

ASML Risk / Return Rank: 93
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOGSX vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOGSX	ASML	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	2.45	-1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	3.04	-1.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.39	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	5.49	-3.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	15.40	-9.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOGSX vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOGSX and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOGSX	ASML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	2.45	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.41	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.81	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.54	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between BOGSX and ASML is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BOGSX vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

BOGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than ASML's 0.71% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOGSX Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund	5.86%	5.76%	7.96%	3.79%	1.87%	11.31%	6.30%	5.47%	11.71%	7.71%	4.00%	3.09%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	0.71%	0.97%	0.97%	0.86%	1.27%	0.50%	0.50%	1.40%	0.94%	0.64%	0.92%	0.73%

Drawdowns

BOGSX vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.80%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOGSX and ASML.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOGSX	ASML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.80%	-90.00%	-2.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.77%	-17.85%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.93%	-56.84%	+22.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.93%	-56.84%	+22.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.20%	-13.47%	+3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.36%	-28.28%	-31.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	6.37%	-2.77%

Volatility

BOGSX vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) is 7.10%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that BOGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOGSX	ASML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.10%	14.88%	-7.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.64%	29.34%	-12.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.96%	41.81%	-15.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.14%	41.55%	-16.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.44%	38.06%	-13.62%