BOGSX vs. CQQQ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BOGSX (Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both funds - BOGSX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Oak Associates, while CQQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. Over the past 10 years, BOGSX returned 15.76%/yr vs 4.48%/yr for CQQQ. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BOGSX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CQQQ.

Performance

BOGSX vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOGSX achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's -3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BOGSX has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 15.76%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 4.48% annualized return.

BOGSX

• 1D: 4.87%
• 1M: -8.41%
• 6M: 23.22%
• YTD: 29.57%
• 1Y: 41.54%
• 3Y*: 18.30%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 15.76%
• ALL TIME*: 2.82%

CQQQ

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -6.83%
• 6M: -9.86%
• YTD: -3.27%
• 1Y: 11.64%
• 3Y*: 6.42%
• 5Y*: -6.40%
• 10Y*: 4.48%
• ALL TIME*: 5.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOGSX Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	$60.75M	$69.64M	$78.22M

BOGSX vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOGSX Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund	29.57%	19.06%	9.25%	17.79%	-27.30%	26.89%	45.16%	38.20%	-4.94%	19.05%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	-3.27%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-24.54%	57.33%	33.57%	-34.77%	74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BOGSX and CQQQ is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2009	0.60

The correlation between BOGSX and CQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BOGSX vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BOGSX

BOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 58
BOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
BOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 18
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOGSX vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOGSX	CQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	0.30	+1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	0.66	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.08	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	0.41	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.45	0.88	+7.57

BOGSX vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOGSX and CQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOGSX vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.80%, which is greater than CQQQ's maximum drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOGSX and CQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOGSX	CQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.80%	-73.99%	-18.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.66%	-24.41%	+5.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.78%	-34.42%	+9.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.93%	-62.09%	+28.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.93%	-73.99%	+40.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.70%	-52.02%	+37.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.63%	-28.49%	-30.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.52%	11.28%	-6.76%

Volatility

BOGSX vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) have volatilities of 11.50% and 12.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOGSX	CQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.50%	12.09%	-0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.57%	24.80%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.70%	32.54%	-5.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.14%	38.19%	-12.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.01%	33.56%	-8.55%

BOGSX vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOGSX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOGSX vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

BOGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than CQQQ's 2.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOGSX Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund	4.45%	5.76%	7.96%	3.79%	1.87%	11.31%	6.30%	5.47%	11.71%	7.71%	4.00%	3.09%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.24%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOGSX and CQQQ in my portfolio?

BOGSX and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOGSX or CQQQ?

CQQQ has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to BOGSX (11.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOGSX dropped -92.80% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.