BOGSX vs. CQQQ

In the year-to-date period, BOGSX achieves a -3.18% return, which is significantly lower than CQQQ's 8.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BOGSX has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 4.28%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 0.47% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BOGSX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BOGSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOGSX and CQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BOGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.

The maximum BOGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.80%, which is greater than CQQQ's maximum drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOGSX and CQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) has a higher volatility of 14.08% compared to Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) at 12.80%. This indicates that BOGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.