BOGSX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
BOGSX is managed by Oak Associates. It was launched on Dec 28, 2000. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
BOGSX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BOGSX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOGSX Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund | 2.33% | 19.06% | 9.25% | 17.79% | -27.30% | 26.89% | 45.16% | 38.20% | -4.94% | 19.05% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOGSX achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BOGSX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.32%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
BOGSX
- 1D
- 4.12%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BOGSX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOGSX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BOGSX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
BOGSX
SCHG
BOGSX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOGSX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.76 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.24 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.17 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 1.09 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 3.71 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOGSX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.76 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.57 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.79 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.79 | -0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between BOGSX and SCHG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BOGSX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
BOGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOGSX Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund | 5.63% | 5.76% | 7.96% | 3.79% | 1.87% | 11.31% | 6.30% | 5.47% | 11.71% | 7.71% | 4.00% | 3.09% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
BOGSX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.80%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOGSX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOGSX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.80% | -34.59% | -58.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.77% | -16.41% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.93% | -34.59% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.93% | -34.59% | +0.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.50% | -12.51% | +6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.36% | -5.22% | -54.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 4.84% | -1.22% |
Volatility
BOGSX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that BOGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOGSX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 6.77% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | 12.54% | +4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.21% | 22.45% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 22.31% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 21.51% | +2.96% |