PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOGSX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOGSX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOGSX achieves a 43.19% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BOGSX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 17.86%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.


BOGSX

1D
2.19%
1M
15.43%
YTD
43.19%
6M
42.65%
1Y
62.39%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
17.86%

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOGSX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOGSX
Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund
43.19%19.06%9.25%17.79%-27.30%26.89%45.16%38.20%-4.94%19.05%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BOGSX and SCHG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.86

The correlation between BOGSX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOGSX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOGSX
BOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOGSX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOGSXSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.03

1.60

+1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

2.18

+1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.28

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.90

1.51

+4.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.24

5.04

+15.20

BOGSX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOGSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOGSX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOGSXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

1.60

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.70

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.87

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.84

-0.74

Drawdowns

BOGSX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.80%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOGSX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOGSXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.80%

-34.59%

-58.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-16.41%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-23.39%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-34.59%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.93%

-34.59%

+0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.78%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-5.20%

-53.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

4.90%

-1.69%

Volatility

BOGSX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund (BOGSX) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that BOGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOGSXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

3.61%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

11.62%

+5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.46%

15.50%

+5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.22%

22.27%

+2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

21.55%

+3.06%

BOGSX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOGSX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOGSX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

BOGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOGSX
Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund
4.02%5.76%7.96%3.79%1.87%11.31%6.30%5.47%11.71%7.71%4.00%3.09%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOGSX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOGSX has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOGSX dropped -92.80% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

BOGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOGSX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer