PRNT vs. XLKI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PRNT (ARK The 3D Printing ETF) and XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. PRNT is passively managed, while XLKI is actively managed. Over the past year, PRNT returned 12.49% vs 24.59% for XLKI. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PRNT charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLKI.

Performance

PRNT vs. XLKI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than XLKI's 10.67% return.

PRNT

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -1.69%
• 6M: 4.38%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 1Y: 12.49%
• 3Y*: -0.12%
• 5Y*: -8.69%
• 10Y*: 2.37%
• ALL TIME*: 2.20%

XLKI

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.06%
• 6M: 9.29%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 1Y: 24.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	$141.16K	$162.57K	$305.15K
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$514.98K	$430.22K	$356.64K

PRNT vs. XLKI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	6.62%	1.99%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	10.67%	10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and XLKI is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.52

The correlation between PRNT and XLKI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRNT vs. XLKI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRNT	XLKI
Technology	47.6%	99.2%
Industrials	31.1%	-
Healthcare	12.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	-
Basic Materials	3.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	0.8%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	99.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PRNT vs. XLKI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRNT

PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 23
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

XLKI

XLKI Risk / Return Rank: 51
XLKI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
XLKI Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
XLKI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
XLKI Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XLKI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRNT vs. XLKI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRNT	XLKI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.13	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	1.61	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.22	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	2.02	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.69	7.10	-5.41

PRNT vs. XLKI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the XLKI Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and XLKI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. XLKI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than XLKI's maximum drawdown of -11.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and XLKI.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRNT	XLKI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.10%	-11.21%	-54.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-11.21%	-6.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.70%	-6.73%	-44.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.25%	-2.16%	-30.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	3.18%	+3.43%

Volatility

PRNT vs. XLKI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) is 5.61%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) has a volatility of 8.68%. This indicates that PRNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRNT	XLKI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	8.68%	-3.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.43%	17.55%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.22%	19.96%	+3.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.17%	19.92%	+6.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.74%	19.92%	+6.82%

PRNT vs. XLKI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRNT vs. XLKI - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than XLKI's 17.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	0.73%	0.78%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.80%	2.16%	0.01%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	17.91%	8.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRNT and XLKI in my portfolio?

PRNT and XLKI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRNT or XLKI?

XLKI has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to PRNT (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs XLKI's -11.21%.

Which ETF is better, PRNT or XLKI?

On 1-year performance, XLKI leads with 24.59% vs 12.49% for PRNT. On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PRNT has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRNT or XLKI?

Over the 1-year period, XLKI has performed better with a 24.59% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRNT or XLKI?

XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRNT or XLKI?

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 17.91%, compared with 0.73% for PRNT.

What is the main difference between PRNT and XLKI?

They also come from different issuers: ARK and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.35% for XLKI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLKI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.