PRNT vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRNT (ARK The 3D Printing ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. PRNT is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRNT charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

PRNT vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PRNT

• 1D: -3.14%
• 1M: 10.65%
• YTD: 13.07%
• 6M: 13.65%
• 1Y: 19.68%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: -8.04%
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNT vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	-2.09%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and ARMH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

PRNT vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT

PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 25
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRNT	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRNT	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	471,500.14	-471,500.03

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRNT	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.10%	-1.61%	-64.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.78%	0.00%	-48.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.96%	-0.40%	-31.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.80%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRNT	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.26%	113.00%	-90.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.07%	113.00%	-86.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.74%	113.00%	-86.26%

PRNT vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRNT vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	0.69%	0.78%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.80%	2.16%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRNT and ARMH in my portfolio?

PRNT and ARMH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRNT or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRNT or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRNT or ARMH?

PRNT has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between PRNT and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: ARK and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.19% for ARMH.