PRN vs. PIE
PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) and PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PRN tracks the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index while PIE tracks the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRN returned 19.03%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for PIE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for PIE.
Performance
PRN vs. PIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 45.08% return, which is significantly higher than PIE's 38.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed PIE with an annualized return of 19.03%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.
PRN
- 1D
- -3.57%
- 1M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 45.08%
- 6M
- 39.29%
- 1Y
- 65.87%
- 3Y*
- 36.27%
- 5Y*
- 20.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.03%
PIE
- 1D
- -5.18%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 38.60%
- 6M
- 34.63%
- 1Y
- 63.22%
- 3Y*
- 23.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
PRN vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 45.08% | 13.74% | 30.35% | 37.96% | -25.09% | 25.21% | 36.39% | 34.52% | -16.19% | 22.82% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 38.60% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 41.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and PIE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.61 |
The correlation between PRN and PIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PRN vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRN
PIE
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
PRN
PIE
Technology
PRN
PIE
Basic Materials
PRN
PIE
Energy
PRN
PIE
Consumer Cyclical
PRN
PIE
Financial Services
PRN
PIE
Communication Services
PRN
-
PIE
Consumer Defensive
PRN
-
PIE
Healthcare
PRN
-
PIE
Real Estate
PRN
-
PIE
Utilities
PRN
-
PIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRN vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank
PRN
PIE
PRN vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRN | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.47 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 6.44 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.34 | 20.03 | -4.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRN vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and PIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRN | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -72.98% | +13.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -9.87% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -28.69% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | -40.32% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | -40.32% | +4.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | -5.18% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -26.01% | +15.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | 3.17% | +1.14% |
Volatility
PRN vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) is 12.02%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 13.28%. This indicates that PRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRN | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 13.28% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.35% | 21.21% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.47% | 24.30% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.41% | 20.85% | +4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 21.57% | +2.81% |
PRN vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRN vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than PIE's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.08% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRN and PIE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to PRN (12.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs PIE's -72.98%.
On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 19.03% vs 10.46% for PIE. On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PRN has been the lower-risk option at 12.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.
PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.90% for PIE.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRN and PIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer