PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRN vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRN vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 27.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed PIE with an annualized return of 16.36%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.76% annualized return.


PRN

1D
1.01%
1M
-8.35%
6M
11.82%
YTD
23.45%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
25.97%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
16.36%
ALL TIME*
12.07%

PIE

1D
2.51%
1M
-8.10%
6M
16.52%
YTD
27.02%
1Y
43.01%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
5.53%
10Y*
8.76%
ALL TIME*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.45M$4.43M$2.83M
$11.92M$11.20M$10.20M

PRN vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRN
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF
23.45%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
27.02%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and PIE is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.61

The correlation between PRN and PIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRN vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRN
PIE

Industrials

73.1%
15.3%

Technology

21.9%
52.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
1.5%

Real Estate

2.3%
3.5%

Energy

1.6%
3.7%

Basic Materials

1.4%
2.9%

Financial Services

1.2%
14.6%

Communication Services

-

1.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Industrials

PRN
73.1%
PIE
15.3%

Technology

PRN
21.9%
PIE
52.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PRN
2.5%
PIE
1.5%

Real Estate

PRN
2.3%
PIE
3.5%

Energy

PRN
1.6%
PIE
3.7%

Basic Materials

PRN
1.4%
PIE
2.9%

Financial Services

PRN
1.2%
PIE
14.6%

Communication Services

PRN

-

PIE
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

PRN

-

PIE
0.2%

Healthcare

PRN

-

PIE
3.2%

Utilities

PRN

-

PIE
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRN vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRN vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRNPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.29

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.53

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

10.20

-5.06

PRN vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRN vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.88%

-72.98%

+13.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.60%

-17.26%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.78%

-28.69%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-37.59%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

-40.32%

+4.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.94%

-13.10%

-4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-25.91%

+15.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

4.28%

+1.85%

Volatility

PRN vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 15.11% compared to Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) at 12.08%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.11%

12.08%

+3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.53%

24.13%

+4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.23%

27.09%

+7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.30%

21.34%

+4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.88%

21.86%

+3.02%

PRN vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRN vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than PIE's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.90%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%
PRN
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF
0.10%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRN and PIE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (15.11%) compared to PIE (12.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 16.36% vs 8.76% for PIE. On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PIE has been the lower-risk option at 12.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 16.36% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.10% for PRN.

PRN tracks Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRN and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer