PRN vs. MGK
PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) and MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRN returned 18.49%/yr vs 18.85%/yr for MGK. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGK.
Performance
PRN vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 40.09% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 5.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRN having a 18.49% annualized return and MGK not far ahead at 18.85%.
PRN
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 40.09%
- 6M
- 38.91%
- 1Y
- 62.65%
- 3Y*
- 34.70%
- 5Y*
- 20.00%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
MGK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 24.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
PRN vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 40.09% | 13.74% | 30.35% | 37.96% | -25.09% | 25.21% | 36.39% | 34.52% | -16.19% | 22.82% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.33% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and MGK is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PRN and MGK shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PRN vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRN
MGK
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
PRN
MGK
Technology
PRN
MGK
Basic Materials
PRN
MGK
Energy
PRN
MGK
-
Consumer Cyclical
PRN
MGK
Financial Services
PRN
MGK
Communication Services
PRN
-
MGK
Consumer Defensive
PRN
-
MGK
Healthcare
PRN
-
MGK
Real Estate
PRN
-
MGK
Utilities
PRN
-
MGK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRN vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
PRN
MGK
PRN vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRN | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.24 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 1.37 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.20 | 4.65 | +9.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRN vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and MGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRN | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -48.43% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -16.85% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -23.36% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | -36.01% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | -36.01% | -0.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -5.63% | +3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -7.58% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 4.97% | -0.67% |
Volatility
PRN vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 5.96%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRN | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.21% | 5.96% | +6.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.73% | 13.29% | +11.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.02% | 16.87% | +13.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 22.72% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 21.93% | +2.40% |
PRN vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRN vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than MGK's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRN and MGK have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRN has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs MGK's -48.43%.
On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.85% vs 18.49% for PRN. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.
MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.12% for PRN.
PRN is categorized as Momentum, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.05% for MGK.
PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRN and MGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer