PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRMSX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRMSX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMSX achieves a 30.76% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PRMSX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.27%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


PRMSX

1D
2.56%
1M
12.24%
YTD
30.76%
6M
34.53%
1Y
63.06%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
2.65%
10Y*
8.27%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRMSX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRMSX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund
30.76%32.46%-1.72%2.08%-23.35%-10.47%17.63%26.51%-16.20%42.27%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMSX and VOO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.67

The correlation between PRMSX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRMSX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRMSX
PRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRMSX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRMSXVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.40

2.53

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.18

3.43

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.46

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

3.42

+1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.68

15.95

+2.73

PRMSX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRMSX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRMSXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

2.53

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.85

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.87

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.89

-0.52

Drawdowns

PRMSX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMSX drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMSX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMSXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.13%

-33.99%

-37.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-8.90%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

-18.69%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.13%

-24.52%

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.28%

-33.99%

-12.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.12%

-3.69%

-17.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

1.91%

+1.42%

Volatility

PRMSX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that PRMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMSXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.18%

2.74%

+5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.30%

8.88%

+7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.98%

11.78%

+7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

16.81%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

18.01%

+0.56%

PRMSX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRMSX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRMSX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund
0.43%0.57%0.35%1.09%1.17%8.26%0.49%1.24%0.61%0.18%0.69%0.56%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRMSX and VOO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRMSX has higher volatility (8.18%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRMSX dropped -71.13% vs VOO's -33.99%.

PRMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRMSX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer