PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRMSX vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRMSX vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMSX achieves a 32.75% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PRMSX has underperformed VWO with an annualized return of 8.39%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.31% annualized return.


PRMSX

1D
3.36%
1M
8.77%
YTD
32.75%
6M
35.45%
1Y
63.81%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
8.39%

VWO

1D
0.77%
1M
3.96%
YTD
14.05%
6M
14.71%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRMSX vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRMSX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund
32.75%32.46%-1.72%2.08%-23.35%-10.47%17.63%26.51%-16.20%42.27%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
14.05%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMSX and VWO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.89

The correlation between PRMSX and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRMSX vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRMSX
PRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRMSX vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRMSXVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.36

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

2.89

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.90

10.19

+7.71

PRMSX vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRMSX and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRMSX vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMSX drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, which is greater than VWO's maximum drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMSX and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMSXVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.13%

-67.68%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-11.17%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

-17.37%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.75%

-32.60%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.28%

-36.39%

-9.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.09%

-15.79%

-5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

3.16%

+0.36%

Volatility

PRMSX vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) has a higher volatility of 11.71% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 6.57%. This indicates that PRMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMSXVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.71%

6.57%

+5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.30%

14.28%

+5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.50%

16.67%

+4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

17.53%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

19.24%

-0.42%

PRMSX vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRMSX vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

PRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than VWO's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRMSX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund
0.43%0.57%0.35%1.09%1.17%8.26%0.49%1.24%0.61%0.18%0.69%0.56%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.26%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRMSX and VWO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRMSX has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to VWO (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRMSX dropped -71.13% vs VWO's -67.68%.

PRMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRMSX and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer