PRMR vs. MTUM
PRMR (PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRMR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by PeakShares, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. PRMR is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRMR charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
PRMR vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRMR achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 22.55% return.
PRMR
- 1D
- -3.37%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 22.55%
- 6M
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- 31.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 16.47%
PRMR vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF | 7.24% | -0.32% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 22.55% | -0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRMR and MTUM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRMR vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
PRMR
MTUM
PRMR vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRMR | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.81 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
PRMR vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRMR drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMR and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRMR | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -34.08% | +24.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -6.99% | +2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -6.21% | +3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.92% | — |
Volatility
PRMR vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRMR | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 20.03% | -5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 20.77% | -6.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 21.12% | -7.08% |
PRMR vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRMR has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRMR vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
PRMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.64% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRMR and MTUM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for PRMR.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for PRMR.
PRMR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: PeakShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for PRMR and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for PRMR and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer