PRISX vs. FLC
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC).
PRISX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 30, 1996. FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003.
Performance
PRISX vs. FLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRISX vs. FLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRISX T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund | -10.22% | 26.17% | 30.87% | 14.95% | -10.99% | 37.83% | 5.65% | 32.84% | -10.12% | 19.17% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRISX achieves a -10.22% return, which is significantly lower than FLC's -3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PRISX has outperformed FLC with an annualized return of 14.72%, while FLC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.33% annualized return.
PRISX
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- -10.22%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 12.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRISX vs. FLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRISX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than FLC's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRISX vs. FLC — Risk / Return Rank
PRISX
FLC
PRISX vs. FLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRISX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.55 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 0.75 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.14 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.70 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | 2.71 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRISX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.55 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | -0.04 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.24 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.28 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRISX and FLC is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PRISX vs. FLC - Dividend Comparison
PRISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.20%, more than FLC's 7.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRISX T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund | 14.20% | 12.75% | 8.74% | 2.00% | 2.08% | 3.00% | 10.22% | 6.14% | 11.97% | 4.68% | 1.00% | 3.86% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
Drawdowns
PRISX vs. FLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRISX drawdown since its inception was -67.34%, smaller than the maximum FLC drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRISX and FLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRISX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.34% | -76.79% | +9.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -8.69% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.95% | -40.14% | +13.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.86% | -55.27% | +12.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.04% | -6.77% | -6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -10.92% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 2.26% | +2.50% |
Volatility
PRISX vs. FLC - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) at 4.25%. This indicates that PRISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRISX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 4.25% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 5.78% | +7.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.53% | 11.34% | +10.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 14.23% | +6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 22.06% | -0.10% |