PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PRGSX vs. CGMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PRGSX vs. CGMU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PRGSX (T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund) and CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) are both funds - PRGSX is a Global Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while CGMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 3 years, PRGSX returned 22.39%/yr vs 4.63%/yr for CGMU. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRGSX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for CGMU.

Performance

PRGSX vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGSX achieves a 19.13% return, which is significantly higher than CGMU's 1.39% return.

PRGSX

1D
3.77%
1M
1.51%
YTD
19.13%
6M
20.89%
1Y
36.75%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
16.85%

CGMU

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.82%
1Y
6.32%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGSX vs. CGMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund		19.13%21.42%16.80%25.70%3.07%
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF		1.39%5.19%2.64%6.76%4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGSX and CGMU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund

Capital Group Municipal Income ETF

Often compared with PRGSX:
PRGSX vs. VTSAXPRGSX vs. VTWAXPRGSX vs. FBGRXPRGSX vs. RPICXPRGSX vs. QQQPRGSX vs. FSPSXPRGSX vs. FTRNX
Often compared with CGMU:
CGMU vs. MUBCGMU vs. FLMICGMU vs. BNDCGMU vs. AUNYXCGMU vs. VYMCGMU vs. VCRBCGMU vs. JMST

Return for Risk

PRGSX vs. CGMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PRGSX
PRGSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PRGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
CGMU
CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGSX vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

PRGSXCGMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.93
2.78

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.53
3.96

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.59

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.49

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.56

7.97

+3.59

PRGSX vs. CGMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the CGMU Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGSX and CGMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRGSX vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGSX drawdown since its inception was -64.06%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGSX and CGMU.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PRGSXCGMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.06%

-4.11%

-59.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

-2.55%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.13%

-3.89%

-17.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.75%

-0.89%

-2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.47%

-0.84%

-12.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

0.79%

+2.42%

Volatility

PRGSX vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 0.81%. This indicates that PRGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PRGSXCGMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

0.81%

+8.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.52%

1.73%

+14.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.31%

2.28%

+17.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.91%

3.47%

+16.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

3.47%

+16.41%

PRGSX vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRGSX vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison

PRGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than CGMU's 3.33% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF		3.33%3.32%3.21%3.08%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund		8.06%9.60%6.73%0.27%0.00%13.67%5.67%2.21%5.81%0.03%0.63%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

PRGSX and CGMU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGSX has higher volatility (8.81%) compared to CGMU (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGSX dropped -64.06% vs CGMU's -4.11%.

CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGSX and CGMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer