PRGS vs. FEAM
PRGS (Progress Software Corporation) and FEAM (5E Advanced Materials Inc) are both stocks. PRGS operates in Software - Application (Technology), while FEAM operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, PRGS returned -19.45%/yr vs -74.33%/yr for FEAM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRGS vs. FEAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGS achieves a -26.75% return, which is significantly higher than FEAM's -44.26% return.
PRGS
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 17.43%
- YTD
- -26.75%
- 6M
- -29.75%
- 1Y
- -49.74%
- 3Y*
- -19.45%
- 5Y*
- -7.35%
- 10Y*
- 3.19%
FEAM
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -11.92%
- YTD
- -44.26%
- 6M
- -55.50%
- 1Y
- -57.90%
- 3Y*
- -74.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRGS vs. FEAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | -26.75% | -34.06% | 21.16% | 8.94% | 18.02% |
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc | -44.26% | -79.28% | -54.61% | -82.11% | -73.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGS and FEAM is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2022 | 0.12 |
The correlation between PRGS and FEAM shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PRGS:
$1.34B
FEAM:
$59.35M
PRGS:
$1.95
FEAM:
-$1.76
PRGS:
2.70
FEAM:
0.81
PRGS:
$987.62M
FEAM:
$0.00
PRGS:
$802.40M
FEAM:
-$10.56M
PRGS:
$136.06M
FEAM:
-$22.23M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRGS vs. FEAM — Risk / Return Rank
PRGS
FEAM
PRGS vs. FEAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRGS | FEAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.97 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.70 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | -1.10 | -0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRGS vs. FEAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGS drawdown since its inception was -67.33%, smaller than the maximum FEAM drawdown of -99.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGS and FEAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGS | FEAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.33% | -99.84% | +32.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.14% | -82.66% | +21.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.10% | -98.85% | +34.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.97% | -99.78% | +44.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.57% | -86.38% | +62.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.81% | 52.56% | -13.75% |
Volatility
PRGS vs. FEAM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is 14.81%, while 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) has a volatility of 27.75%. This indicates that PRGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRGS | FEAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.81% | 27.75% | -12.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.69% | 75.44% | -33.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.89% | 115.11% | -66.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.42% | 109.76% | -76.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.17% | 109.76% | -76.59% |
Dividends
PRGS vs. FEAM - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRGS nor FEAM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 1.29% | 1.39% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.21% | 0.39% |
Financials
PRGS vs. FEAM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Progress Software Corporation and 5E Advanced Materials Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PRGS and FEAM have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEAM has higher volatility (27.75%) compared to PRGS (14.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGS dropped -67.33% vs FEAM's -99.84%.
FEAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRGS and FEAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer