PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAM vs. RCAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FEAM vs. RCAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAM achieves a -42.62% return, which is significantly lower than RCAT's 73.90% return.


FEAM

1D
-5.91%
1M
3.55%
YTD
-42.62%
6M
-56.03%
1Y
-60.23%
3Y*
-71.96%
5Y*
10Y*

RCAT

1D
-7.76%
1M
25.36%
YTD
73.90%
6M
82.65%
1Y
98.99%
3Y*
142.10%
5Y*
42.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAM vs. RCAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc
-42.62%-79.28%-54.61%-82.11%-76.13%
RCAT
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
73.90%-38.29%1,360.23%-6.38%-57.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAM and RCAT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2022

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FEAM:

$61.10M

RCAT:

$1.67B

EPS

FEAM:

-$1.76

RCAT:

-$0.78

PB Ratio

FEAM:

0.84

RCAT:

6.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

FEAM:

$0.00

RCAT:

$52.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FEAM:

-$10.56M

RCAT:

$2.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

FEAM:

-$22.23M

RCAT:

-$79.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAM vs. RCAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAM
FEAM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

RCAT
RCAT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RCAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RCAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAM vs. RCAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEAMRCATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.22

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

1.66

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.18

3.34

-4.52

FEAM vs. RCAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the RCAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAM and RCAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEAMRCATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

0.83

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.70

-0.06

-0.64

Drawdowns

FEAM vs. RCAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAM drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, roughly equal to the maximum RCAT drawdown of -99.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAM and RCAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEAMRCATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.84%

-99.76%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.66%

-60.08%

-22.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.85%

-67.16%

-31.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.77%

-91.73%

-8.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.37%

-95.53%

+9.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.23%

29.75%

+21.48%

Volatility

FEAM vs. RCAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) is 35.53%, while Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) has a volatility of 38.59%. This indicates that FEAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEAMRCATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.53%

38.59%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.61%

83.20%

-10.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.39%

120.70%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.54%

114.95%

-5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.54%

239.60%

-130.06%

Dividends

FEAM vs. RCAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEAM nor RCAT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FEAM vs. RCAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 5E Advanced Materials Inc and Red Cat Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00M202220232024202520260
15.47M
(FEAM) Total Revenue
(RCAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FEAM and RCAT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RCAT has higher volatility (38.59%) compared to FEAM (35.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAM dropped -99.84% vs RCAT's -99.76%.

RCAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAM and RCAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer