PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGS vs. TEAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

PRGS vs. TEAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PRGS vs. TEAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
-40.29%-34.06%21.16%8.94%6.05%8.44%10.64%18.95%-15.41%35.45%
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation Plc
-57.91%-33.38%2.32%84.85%-66.25%63.04%94.34%35.24%95.47%89.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRGS:

$1.10B

TEAM:

$17.98B

EPS

PRGS:

$1.95

TEAM:

-$0.72

PS Ratio

PRGS:

1.13

TEAM:

3.12

PB Ratio

PRGS:

2.20

TEAM:

11.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRGS:

$987.62M

TEAM:

$5.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRGS:

$802.40M

TEAM:

$4.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRGS:

$136.06M

TEAM:

-$92.45M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGS achieves a -40.29% return, which is significantly higher than TEAM's -57.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGS has underperformed TEAM with an annualized return of 1.43%, while TEAM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.16% annualized return.


PRGS

1D
-9.27%
1M
-38.75%
YTD
-40.29%
6M
-41.61%
1Y
-50.20%
3Y*
-23.09%
5Y*
-9.80%
10Y*
1.43%

TEAM

1D
2.05%
1M
-9.16%
YTD
-57.91%
6M
-57.26%
1Y
-67.84%
3Y*
-26.40%
5Y*
-21.09%
10Y*
11.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGS vs. TEAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGS
PRGS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PRGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TEAM
TEAM Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGS vs. TEAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRGSTEAMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.13

-1.29

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.73

-2.38

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.72

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.96

+0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.66

-1.95

+0.29

PRGS vs. TEAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGS Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is comparable to the TEAM Sharpe Ratio of -1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGS and TEAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRGSTEAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.13

-1.29

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

-0.37

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.22

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.18

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between PRGS and TEAM is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PRGS vs. TEAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRGS nor TEAM has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.81%1.29%1.39%1.45%1.48%1.52%1.62%1.21%0.39%
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation Plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PRGS vs. TEAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGS drawdown since its inception was -67.33%, smaller than the maximum TEAM drawdown of -85.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGS and TEAM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGSTEAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.33%

-85.79%

+18.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.33%

-71.67%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.30%

-85.79%

+22.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.30%

-85.79%

+22.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.30%

-85.10%

+21.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.37%

-28.80%

+5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.14%

35.20%

-5.06%

Volatility

PRGS vs. TEAM - Volatility Comparison

Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) have volatilities of 16.79% and 17.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PRGSTEAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.79%

17.11%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.11%

38.75%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.66%

52.95%

-8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.76%

57.70%

-25.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.29%

49.88%

-17.59%

Financials

PRGS vs. TEAM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Progress Software Corporation and Atlassian Corporation Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
247.80M
1.59B
(PRGS) Total Revenue
(TEAM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PRGS vs. TEAM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Progress Software Corporation and Atlassian Corporation Plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%81.0%82.0%83.0%84.0%85.0%86.0%20222023202420252026
82.3%
85.0%
Portfolio components
PRGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported a gross profit of 203.94M and revenue of 247.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.3%.

TEAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 1.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.0%.

PRGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported an operating income of 46.47M and revenue of 247.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

TEAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported an operating income of -47.75M and revenue of 1.59B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.0%.

PRGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported a net income of 22.81M and revenue of 247.80M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.

TEAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported a net income of -42.65M and revenue of 1.59B, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.