PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PRGS vs. TEAM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PRGS and TEAM is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

PRGS vs. TEAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
13.26%
44.38%
PRGS
TEAM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PRGS:

0.75

TEAM:

0.12

Sortino Ratio

PRGS:

1.59

TEAM:

0.49

Omega Ratio

PRGS:

1.18

TEAM:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

PRGS:

0.95

TEAM:

0.08

Martin Ratio

PRGS:

2.24

TEAM:

0.21

Ulcer Index

PRGS:

8.94%

TEAM:

27.25%

Daily Std Dev

PRGS:

26.59%

TEAM:

46.88%

Max Drawdown

PRGS:

-67.33%

TEAM:

-74.61%

Current Drawdown

PRGS:

-8.83%

TEAM:

-44.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRGS:

$2.72B

TEAM:

$65.12B

EPS

PRGS:

$1.86

TEAM:

-$1.53

PEG Ratio

PRGS:

5.68

TEAM:

3.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRGS:

$538.45M

TEAM:

$3.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRGS:

$410.80M

TEAM:

$2.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRGS:

$185.36M

TEAM:

$18.18M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGS achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than TEAM's 4.47% return.


PRGS

YTD

-2.19%

1M

-7.46%

6M

13.26%

1Y

13.79%

5Y*

6.85%

10Y*

11.03%

TEAM

YTD

4.47%

1M

-5.76%

6M

44.38%

1Y

7.29%

5Y*

13.91%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRGS vs. TEAM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRGS is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRGS is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRGS is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRGS is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRGS is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRGS is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TEAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TEAM is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TEAM is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TEAM is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TEAM is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TEAM is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TEAM is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PRGS vs. TEAM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PRGS, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.750.12
The chart of Sortino ratio for PRGS, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.590.49
The chart of Omega ratio for PRGS, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.181.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for PRGS, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.950.08
The chart of Martin ratio for PRGS, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.240.21
PRGS
TEAM

The current PRGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the TEAM Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGS and TEAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.75
0.12
PRGS
TEAM

Dividends

PRGS vs. TEAM - Dividend Comparison

PRGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while TEAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
0.82%0.81%1.29%1.39%1.45%1.48%1.52%1.62%1.21%0.39%
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation Plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PRGS vs. TEAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGS drawdown since its inception was -67.33%, smaller than the maximum TEAM drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGS and TEAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-8.83%
-44.50%
PRGS
TEAM

Volatility

PRGS vs. TEAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is 5.73%, while Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that PRGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.73%
12.11%
PRGS
TEAM

Financials

PRGS vs. TEAM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Progress Software Corporation and Atlassian Corporation Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab