FEAM vs. LPTH
FEAM (5E Advanced Materials Inc) and LPTH (LightPath Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. FEAM operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while LPTH operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 3 years, FEAM returned -71.96%/yr vs 117.89%/yr for LPTH. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FEAM vs. LPTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAM achieves a -42.62% return, which is significantly lower than LPTH's 44.63% return.
FEAM
- 1D
- -5.91%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- -42.62%
- 6M
- -56.03%
- 1Y
- -60.23%
- 3Y*
- -71.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LPTH
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 26.68%
- YTD
- 44.63%
- 6M
- 87.07%
- 1Y
- 438.62%
- 3Y*
- 117.89%
- 5Y*
- 40.53%
- 10Y*
- 24.12%
FEAM vs. LPTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc | -42.62% | -79.28% | -54.61% | -82.11% | -76.13% |
LPTH LightPath Technologies, Inc. | 44.63% | 205.95% | 180.16% | 3.28% | -41.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAM and LPTH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2022 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
FEAM:
$61.10M
LPTH:
$915.78M
FEAM:
-$1.76
LPTH:
-$85.64K
FEAM:
0.84
LPTH:
0.00
FEAM:
$0.00
LPTH:
$19.15T
FEAM:
-$10.56M
LPTH:
$6.96T
FEAM:
-$22.23M
LPTH:
-$4.25T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAM vs. LPTH — Risk / Return Rank
FEAM
LPTH
FEAM vs. LPTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAM | LPTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | 3.91 | -4.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | 3.48 | -3.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.42 | -0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 10.91 | -11.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 25.54 | -26.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAM | LPTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | 3.91 | -4.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.70 | 0.03 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
FEAM vs. LPTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAM drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, roughly equal to the maximum LPTH drawdown of -99.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAM and LPTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAM | LPTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -99.65% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.66% | -40.52% | -42.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.85% | -61.08% | -37.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.77% | -76.08% | -23.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.37% | -86.32% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.23% | 17.28% | +33.95% |
Volatility
FEAM vs. LPTH - Volatility Comparison
5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) has a higher volatility of 35.53% compared to LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH) at 30.82%. This indicates that FEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LPTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAM | LPTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.53% | 30.82% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.61% | 81.01% | -8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.39% | 113.26% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.54% | 83.71% | +25.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.54% | 79.22% | +30.32% |
Dividends
FEAM vs. LPTH - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEAM nor LPTH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FEAM vs. LPTH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 5E Advanced Materials Inc and LightPath Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FEAM and LPTH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEAM has higher volatility (35.53%) compared to LPTH (30.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAM dropped -99.84% vs LPTH's -99.65%.
LPTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEAM and LPTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer