FEAM vs. CNXC
FEAM (5E Advanced Materials Inc) and CNXC (Concentrix Corporation) are both stocks. FEAM operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while CNXC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 3 years, FEAM returned -71.38%/yr vs -30.68%/yr for CNXC. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FEAM vs. CNXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAM achieves a -39.02% return, which is significantly lower than CNXC's -31.89% return.
FEAM
- 1D
- 3.91%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- -39.02%
- 6M
- -50.66%
- 1Y
- -57.04%
- 3Y*
- -71.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNXC
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- -31.89%
- 6M
- -23.31%
- 1Y
- -47.71%
- 3Y*
- -30.68%
- 5Y*
- -27.24%
- 10Y*
- —
FEAM vs. CNXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc | -39.02% | -79.28% | -54.61% | -82.11% | -76.13% |
CNXC Concentrix Corporation | -31.89% | -1.39% | -55.03% | -25.36% | -31.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAM and CNXC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2022 | 0.15 |
The correlation between FEAM and CNXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FEAM:
$64.94M
CNXC:
$1.70B
FEAM:
-$1.76
CNXC:
-$21.33
FEAM:
0.89
CNXC:
0.61
FEAM:
$0.00
CNXC:
$9.95B
FEAM:
-$10.56M
CNXC:
$3.27B
FEAM:
-$22.23M
CNXC:
-$944.68M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAM vs. CNXC — Risk / Return Rank
FEAM
CNXC
FEAM vs. CNXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAM | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | -0.78 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | -0.93 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.88 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | -0.78 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | -1.30 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAM | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | -0.78 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.70 | -0.33 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
FEAM vs. CNXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAM drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than CNXC's maximum drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAM and CNXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAM | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -87.86% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.66% | -61.71% | -20.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.85% | -76.50% | -22.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -87.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.76% | -85.33% | -14.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.36% | -47.57% | -38.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.01% | 36.86% | +14.15% |
Volatility
FEAM vs. CNXC - Volatility Comparison
5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) has a higher volatility of 35.21% compared to Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) at 15.88%. This indicates that FEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAM | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.21% | 15.88% | +19.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.62% | 51.82% | +20.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.25% | 61.20% | +52.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.56% | 48.24% | +61.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.56% | 49.79% | +59.77% |
Dividends
FEAM vs. CNXC - Dividend Comparison
FEAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXC Concentrix Corporation | 5.10% | 3.27% | 2.87% | 1.15% | 0.77% | 0.14% |
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FEAM vs. CNXC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 5E Advanced Materials Inc and Concentrix Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FEAM and CNXC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEAM has higher volatility (35.21%) compared to CNXC (15.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAM dropped -99.84% vs CNXC's -87.86%.
FEAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEAM and CNXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer