PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAM vs. CNXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FEAM vs. CNXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAM achieves a -39.02% return, which is significantly lower than CNXC's -31.89% return.


FEAM

1D
3.91%
1M
5.68%
YTD
-39.02%
6M
-50.66%
1Y
-57.04%
3Y*
-71.38%
5Y*
10Y*

CNXC

1D
-2.84%
1M
17.74%
YTD
-31.89%
6M
-23.31%
1Y
-47.71%
3Y*
-30.68%
5Y*
-27.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAM vs. CNXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc
-39.02%-79.28%-54.61%-82.11%-76.13%
CNXC
Concentrix Corporation
-31.89%-1.39%-55.03%-25.36%-31.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAM and CNXC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2022

0.15

The correlation between FEAM and CNXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FEAM:

$64.94M

CNXC:

$1.70B

EPS

FEAM:

-$1.76

CNXC:

-$21.33

PB Ratio

FEAM:

0.89

CNXC:

0.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

FEAM:

$0.00

CNXC:

$9.95B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FEAM:

-$10.56M

CNXC:

$3.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

FEAM:

-$22.23M

CNXC:

-$944.68M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAM vs. CNXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAM
FEAM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

CNXC
CNXC Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CNXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXC Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAM vs. CNXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEAMCNXCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.51

-0.78

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.31

-0.93

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.88

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

-0.78

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.13

-1.30

+0.16

FEAM vs. CNXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is higher than the CNXC Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAM and CNXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEAMCNXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

-0.78

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.70

-0.33

-0.37

Drawdowns

FEAM vs. CNXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAM drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than CNXC's maximum drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAM and CNXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEAMCNXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.84%

-87.86%

-11.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.66%

-61.71%

-20.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.85%

-76.50%

-22.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.76%

-85.33%

-14.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.36%

-47.57%

-38.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.01%

36.86%

+14.15%

Volatility

FEAM vs. CNXC - Volatility Comparison

5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) has a higher volatility of 35.21% compared to Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) at 15.88%. This indicates that FEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEAMCNXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.21%

15.88%

+19.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.62%

51.82%

+20.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.25%

61.20%

+52.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.56%

48.24%

+61.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.56%

49.79%

+59.77%

Dividends

FEAM vs. CNXC - Dividend Comparison

FEAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CNXC
Concentrix Corporation
5.10%3.27%2.87%1.15%0.77%0.14%
FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FEAM vs. CNXC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 5E Advanced Materials Inc and Concentrix Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B202220232024202520260
2.50B
(FEAM) Total Revenue
(CNXC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FEAM and CNXC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEAM has higher volatility (35.21%) compared to CNXC (15.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAM dropped -99.84% vs CNXC's -87.86%.

FEAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAM and CNXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer