PRFZ vs. SCHP
PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRFZ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ returned 11.95%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for SCHP. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. PRFZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
PRFZ vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 15.55% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 11.95%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.60% annualized return.
PRFZ
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 35.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
PRFZ vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 15.55% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 20.21% | -16.29% | 28.26% | 11.84% | 21.91% | -11.43% | 13.82% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFZ and SCHP is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | -0.06 |
The correlation between PRFZ and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRFZ vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
PRFZ
SCHP
PRFZ vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRFZ | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 2.45 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 7.41 | +3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRFZ vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFZ | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.41% | -14.26% | -48.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -1.93% | -8.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.54% | -4.48% | -22.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -14.26% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.28% | -14.26% | -30.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.44% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -3.93% | -5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 0.64% | +2.37% |
Volatility
PRFZ vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.02%. This indicates that PRFZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRFZ | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 1.02% | +4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.93% | 2.24% | +10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 3.30% | +15.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 6.12% | +15.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 5.59% | +16.87% |
PRFZ vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRFZ vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.82% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRFZ and SCHP have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRFZ has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.95% vs 2.60% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 0.82% for PRFZ.
PRFZ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.03% for SCHP.
PRFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRFZ and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer