PRFZ vs. ROSC
PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - PRFZ tracks the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index while ROSC tracks the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ returned 12.16%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for ROSC. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRFZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.
Performance
PRFZ vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRFZ having a 16.06% return and ROSC slightly higher at 16.64%. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has outperformed ROSC with an annualized return of 12.16%, while ROSC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.36% annualized return.
PRFZ
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 34.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
ROSC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 34.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
PRFZ vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 16.06% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 20.21% | -16.29% | 28.26% | 11.84% | 21.91% | -11.43% | 13.82% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 16.64% | 10.18% | 7.28% | 18.88% | -10.58% | 31.37% | 5.27% | 17.09% | -12.38% | 24.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFZ and ROSC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015 | 0.84 |
The correlation between PRFZ and ROSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
PRFZ vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRFZ
ROSC
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
PRFZ
ROSC
Healthcare
PRFZ
ROSC
Industrials
PRFZ
ROSC
Financial Services
PRFZ
ROSC
Consumer Cyclical
PRFZ
ROSC
Real Estate
PRFZ
ROSC
Energy
PRFZ
ROSC
Basic Materials
PRFZ
ROSC
Communication Services
PRFZ
ROSC
Consumer Defensive
PRFZ
ROSC
Utilities
PRFZ
ROSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRFZ vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
PRFZ
ROSC
PRFZ vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRFZ | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 4.52 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 14.75 | -3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRFZ vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than ROSC's maximum drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and ROSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFZ | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.41% | -43.13% | -19.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -7.75% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.54% | -23.74% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -23.74% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.28% | -43.13% | -1.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.33% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -7.18% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.37% | +0.64% |
Volatility
PRFZ vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) at 3.54%. This indicates that PRFZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRFZ | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 3.54% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 10.40% | +2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 15.53% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 19.29% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 20.24% | +2.20% |
PRFZ vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRFZ vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than ROSC's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.81% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.79% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRFZ and ROSC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRFZ has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to ROSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs ROSC's -43.13%.
On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 12.16% vs 11.36% for ROSC. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 12.16% return vs 11.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.81% for PRFZ.
PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRFZ and ROSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer