PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PWB vs. XLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PWBXLG
YTD Return33.98%31.92%
1Y Return41.92%37.60%
3Y Return (Ann)9.23%12.20%
5Y Return (Ann)16.35%18.50%
10Y Return (Ann)14.42%15.08%
Sharpe Ratio2.712.58
Sortino Ratio3.593.38
Omega Ratio1.481.48
Calmar Ratio4.113.33
Martin Ratio16.8413.88
Ulcer Index2.45%2.72%
Daily Std Dev15.24%14.62%
Max Drawdown-52.58%-52.39%
Current Drawdown-1.19%-0.72%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between PWB and XLG is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PWB vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 33.98% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 31.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PWB having a 14.42% annualized return and XLG not far ahead at 15.08%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.85%
15.20%
PWB
XLG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PWB vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for PWB: current value at 0.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.56%
Expense ratio chart for XLG: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PWB vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PWB, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.71
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PWB, currently valued at 3.59, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PWB, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PWB, currently valued at 4.11, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PWB, currently valued at 16.84, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0016.84
XLG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLG, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.58
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLG, currently valued at 3.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLG, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLG, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.33
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLG, currently valued at 13.88, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.88

PWB vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWB and XLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.71
2.58
PWB
XLG

Dividends

PWB vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

PWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than XLG's 0.72% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.11%0.37%0.31%0.03%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%0.43%0.42%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%1.97%1.97%

Drawdowns

PWB vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, roughly equal to the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.19%
-0.72%
PWB
XLG

Volatility

PWB vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.38%
4.53%
PWB
XLG