PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFZ vs. FYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFZ vs. FYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly lower than FYX's 22.94% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has underperformed FYX with an annualized return of 12.16%, while FYX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.06% annualized return.


PRFZ

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.82%
YTD
16.06%
6M
13.71%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
12.16%

FYX

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.51%
YTD
22.94%
6M
20.86%
1Y
47.16%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFZ vs. FYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
16.06%11.26%12.68%20.21%-16.29%28.26%11.84%21.91%-11.43%13.82%
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
22.94%12.68%12.22%18.30%-18.41%27.43%19.48%21.32%-10.64%14.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and FYX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.94

The correlation between PRFZ and FYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRFZ vs. FYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRFZ
FYX

Technology

19.6%
11.7%

Healthcare

16.8%
14.0%

Industrials

16.6%
16.6%

Financial Services

13.2%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
11.7%

Real Estate

7.2%
8.6%

Energy

5.0%
5.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%
4.5%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
5.3%

Utilities

1.5%
1.6%

Technology

PRFZ
19.6%
FYX
11.7%

Healthcare

PRFZ
16.8%
FYX
14.0%

Industrials

PRFZ
16.6%
FYX
16.6%

Financial Services

PRFZ
13.2%
FYX
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PRFZ
10.8%
FYX
11.7%

Real Estate

PRFZ
7.2%
FYX
8.6%

Energy

PRFZ
5.0%
FYX
5.7%

Basic Materials

PRFZ
3.5%
FYX
4.5%

Communication Services

PRFZ
2.9%
FYX
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

PRFZ
2.8%
FYX
5.3%

Utilities

PRFZ
1.5%
FYX
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFZ vs. FYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFZ
PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FYX
FYX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFZ vs. FYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFZFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

6.27

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

20.40

-9.03

PRFZ vs. FYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and FYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. FYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, roughly equal to the maximum FYX drawdown of -61.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and FYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFZFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.41%

-61.80%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-7.56%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.54%

-27.91%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-27.91%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

-48.82%

+4.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.12%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-10.86%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.32%

+0.69%

Volatility

PRFZ vs. FYX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) at 4.89%. This indicates that PRFZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFZFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

4.89%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

12.29%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.30%

18.42%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.35%

21.96%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

24.20%

-1.76%

PRFZ vs. FYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FYX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFZ vs. FYX - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than FYX's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.67%0.64%1.62%1.22%0.95%0.99%0.65%1.12%1.08%0.60%0.94%0.88%
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
0.81%0.82%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PRFZ and FYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRFZ has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to FYX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs FYX's -61.80%.

On 10-year performance, FYX leads with 13.06% vs 12.16% for PRFZ. On fees, PRFZ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYX has performed better with a 13.06% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRFZ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.

PRFZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.67% for FYX.

PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.63% for FYX.

FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFZ and FYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer