PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFZ vs. BBSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFZ vs. BBSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than BBSC's 15.75% return.


PRFZ

1D
-1.32%
1M
2.22%
YTD
12.74%
6M
11.50%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
11.50%

BBSC

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.71%
YTD
15.75%
6M
14.20%
1Y
35.98%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFZ vs. BBSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
12.74%11.26%12.68%20.21%-16.29%28.26%9.66%
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
15.75%10.38%12.31%20.07%-19.75%15.44%11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and BBSC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.98

The correlation between PRFZ and BBSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRFZ vs. BBSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRFZ
BBSC

Technology

20.4%
18.5%

Industrials

16.5%
14.9%

Healthcare

16.2%
15.7%

Financial Services

13.5%
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.0%

Real Estate

6.8%
7.7%

Energy

5.7%
6.4%

Basic Materials

3.3%
4.1%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
3.2%

Utilities

1.5%
1.2%

Technology

PRFZ
20.4%
BBSC
18.5%

Industrials

PRFZ
16.5%
BBSC
14.9%

Healthcare

PRFZ
16.2%
BBSC
15.7%

Financial Services

PRFZ
13.5%
BBSC
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PRFZ
10.2%
BBSC
9.0%

Real Estate

PRFZ
6.8%
BBSC
7.7%

Energy

PRFZ
5.7%
BBSC
6.4%

Basic Materials

PRFZ
3.3%
BBSC
4.1%

Communication Services

PRFZ
2.6%
BBSC
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

PRFZ
2.5%
BBSC
3.2%

Utilities

PRFZ
1.5%
BBSC
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFZ vs. BBSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFZ
PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFZ vs. BBSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRFZBBSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.79

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.58

12.35

-1.77

PRFZ vs. BBSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the BBSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and BBSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRFZBBSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.90

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.29

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.49

-0.08

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. BBSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than BBSC's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and BBSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFZBBSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.41%

-30.96%

-31.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-9.54%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.54%

-29.32%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-30.96%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.48%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-11.49%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.92%

+0.09%

Volatility

PRFZ vs. BBSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 4.51%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFZBBSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

4.91%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

12.98%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.90%

19.12%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

22.93%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

22.86%

-0.42%

PRFZ vs. BBSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSC's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFZ vs. BBSC - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than BBSC's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.03%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
0.85%0.82%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PRFZ and BBSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBSC has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to PRFZ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs BBSC's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, PRFZ leads with 7.93% vs 6.64% for BBSC. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 7.93% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.

BBSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.85% for PRFZ.

PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.09% for BBSC.

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFZ and BBSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer