PRF vs. DIVB
PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while DIVB is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRF returned 13.60%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for DIVB. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.
Performance
PRF vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 17.38% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 22.13% return.
PRF
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- YTD
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 30.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
DIVB
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 18.62%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 1Y
- 30.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.09%
- 10Y*
- —
PRF vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 17.38% | 18.33% | 16.73% | 15.72% | -7.79% | 31.12% | 7.78% | 27.42% | -8.71% | 4.71% |
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 22.13% | 15.09% | 18.59% | 13.27% | -10.51% | 31.29% | 10.78% | 32.72% | -8.16% | 5.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRF and DIVB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between PRF and DIVB shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRF vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank
PRF
DIVB
PRF vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRF | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.45 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 4.49 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.15 | 15.05 | +4.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRF vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than DIVB's maximum drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and DIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRF | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.35% | -36.93% | -23.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -6.82% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | -15.45% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -21.08% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -4.94% | -1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 2.03% | -0.42% |
Volatility
PRF vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is 2.15%, while iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that PRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRF | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.15% | 4.76% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.07% | 9.50% | -1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 12.16% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 15.35% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 18.35% | -0.77% |
PRF vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRF vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison
PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than DIVB's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 2.17% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.36% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRF and DIVB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVB has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to PRF (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs DIVB's -36.93%.
On 5-year performance, PRF leads with 13.60% vs 13.09% for DIVB. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PRF has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 13.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.
DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.36% for PRF.
PRF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVB is Dividend. PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.05% for DIVB.
PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRF and DIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer