PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRDSX vs. NEAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PRDSX vs. NEAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PRDSX vs. NEAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRDSX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund
-0.54%17.44%12.97%21.15%-22.49%11.15%23.85%32.75%-6.91%22.12%
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
11.92%26.40%14.31%37.65%-27.53%37.56%51.53%43.82%-16.09%8.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRDSX achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than NEAGX's 11.92% return. Over the past 10 years, PRDSX has underperformed NEAGX with an annualized return of 11.28%, while NEAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.04% annualized return.


PRDSX

1D
4.30%
1M
-7.15%
YTD
-0.54%
6M
7.63%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
11.28%

NEAGX

1D
4.33%
1M
-7.75%
YTD
11.92%
6M
14.19%
1Y
60.51%
3Y*
26.85%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
18.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRDSX vs. NEAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRDSX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PRDSX vs. NEAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRDSX
PRDSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAGX
NEAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRDSX vs. NEAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRDSXNEAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

2.14

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

2.71

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

4.27

-2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.71

15.19

-7.49

PRDSX vs. NEAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the NEAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRDSX and NEAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRDSXNEAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.14

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.62

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.76

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.59

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between PRDSX and NEAGX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PRDSX vs. NEAGX - Dividend Comparison

PRDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.76%, more than NEAGX's 1.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRDSX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund
12.76%12.70%7.96%2.43%3.72%13.97%2.91%4.12%4.53%0.10%0.02%1.83%
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
1.91%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%

Drawdowns

PRDSX vs. NEAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRDSX drawdown since its inception was -58.95%, which is greater than NEAGX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDSX and NEAGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PRDSXNEAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.95%

-41.80%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.24%

-14.01%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.17%

-36.31%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.61%

-36.31%

-1.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.30%

-7.75%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.23%

-8.72%

-5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.93%

-0.47%

Volatility

PRDSX vs. NEAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) is 8.74%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that PRDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PRDSXNEAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.74%

11.64%

-2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

19.84%

-4.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.62%

28.93%

-5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

24.33%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.50%

23.90%

-2.40%