PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRDSX vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRDSX vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRDSX achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 21.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PRDSX has outperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 11.75%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.88% annualized return.


PRDSX

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.03%
6M
12.06%
YTD
18.39%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
11.75%

SCHA

1D
-1.69%
1M
-1.21%
6M
14.27%
YTD
21.01%
1Y
33.94%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
10.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRDSX vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRDSX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund
18.39%10.10%12.97%21.15%-22.49%11.15%23.85%32.75%-6.91%22.12%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
21.01%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PRDSX and SCHA is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.96

The correlation between PRDSX and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRDSX vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRDSX
PRDSX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PRDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRDSX vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRDSXSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.59

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

12.73

-4.14

PRDSX vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRDSX and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRDSX vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRDSX drawdown since its inception was -58.95%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDSX and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRDSXSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.95%

-42.41%

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.08%

-9.50%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.84%

-27.29%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.17%

-30.79%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.61%

-42.41%

+4.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-5.01%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.11%

-7.54%

-6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.67%

+0.48%

Volatility

PRDSX vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) have volatilities of 6.67% and 6.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRDSXSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

6.97%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.96%

14.39%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.00%

19.07%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

22.09%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.53%

22.74%

-1.21%

PRDSX vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRDSX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRDSX vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

PRDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than SCHA's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRDSX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund
5.36%6.35%7.96%2.43%3.72%13.97%2.91%4.12%4.53%0.10%0.02%1.83%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.04%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PRDSX and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHA has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to PRDSX (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRDSX dropped -58.95% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRDSX and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer