PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRA.TO vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRA.TO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRA.TO is traded in CAD, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRA.TO achieves a 24.32% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 12.66% return. Over the past 10 years, PRA.TO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.80%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.44% annualized return.


PRA.TO

1D
0.37%
1M
0.83%
YTD
24.32%
6M
24.16%
1Y
42.26%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
15.00%
10Y*
10.80%

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
7.45%
YTD
12.66%
6M
10.84%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
23.99%
5Y*
17.22%
10Y*
16.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRA.TO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRA.TO
Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund
24.32%18.21%8.78%2.07%15.88%23.55%5.06%14.16%-7.41%3.51%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
12.32%12.42%35.71%23.54%-12.34%27.63%16.32%24.91%3.60%14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PRA.TO and VOO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2013

0.19

The correlation between PRA.TO and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRA.TO vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRA.TO
VOO

Basic Materials

35.8%
1.8%

Energy

20.4%
3.5%

Utilities

16.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

15.4%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
4.9%

Industrials

1.0%
8.3%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Technology

-

35.7%

Basic Materials

PRA.TO
35.8%
VOO
1.8%

Energy

PRA.TO
20.4%
VOO
3.5%

Utilities

PRA.TO
16.7%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

PRA.TO
15.4%
VOO
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

PRA.TO
10.8%
VOO
4.9%

Industrials

PRA.TO
1.0%
VOO
8.3%

Communication Services

PRA.TO

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PRA.TO

-

VOO
10.2%

Financial Services

PRA.TO

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

PRA.TO

-

VOO
8.5%

Technology

PRA.TO

-

VOO
35.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRA.TO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRA.TO
PRA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PRA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PRA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRA.TO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRA.TOVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.50

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.02

3.51

+9.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.59

13.34

+23.25

PRA.TO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRA.TO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRA.TOVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43

2.60

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

1.16

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

1.01

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.15

-0.60

Drawdowns

PRA.TO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRA.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.43%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -27.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRA.TO and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRA.TOVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.43%

-27.65%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-8.62%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-18.93%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

-22.08%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.26%

-27.65%

-4.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

0.00%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-3.24%

-4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

2.26%

-1.10%

Volatility

PRA.TO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.60%. This indicates that PRA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRA.TOVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

2.60%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

8.79%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.40%

11.64%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

14.91%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.41%

16.28%

-1.87%

Dividends

PRA.TO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PRA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRA.TO
Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund
2.09%3.23%2.95%3.12%1.93%1.25%1.52%1.57%1.77%1.55%1.64%2.09%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRA.TO and VOO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRA.TO and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer