PRA.TO vs. CMDY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRA.TO (Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRA.TO is a fund fund, while CMDY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Over the past 5 years, PRA.TO returned 15.00%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for CMDY. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PRA.TO vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PRA.TO is traded in CAD, while CMDY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CMDY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRA.TO achieves a 24.32% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 27.03% return.

PRA.TO

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 24.32%
• 6M: 24.16%
• 1Y: 42.26%
• 3Y*: 19.55%
• 5Y*: 15.00%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

CMDY

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 27.03%
• 6M: 24.05%
• 1Y: 38.87%
• 3Y*: 16.83%
• 5Y*: 13.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRA.TO vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PRA.TO Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund	24.32%	18.21%	8.78%	2.07%	15.88%	23.55%	5.06%	14.16%	-4.94%
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF	27.03%	10.50%	14.49%	-11.33%	22.71%	25.23%	-0.55%	-0.20%	-4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PRA.TO and CMDY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018	0.35

The correlation between PRA.TO and CMDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRA.TO vs. CMDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRA.TO	CMDY
Basic Materials	35.8%	-
Energy	20.4%	-
Utilities	16.7%	-
Real Estate	15.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	10.8%	-
Industrials	1.0%	-
Communication Services	-	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

PRA.TO vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRA.TO

PRA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
PRA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PRA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PRA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PRA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PRA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CMDY

CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 72
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRA.TO vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRA.TO	CMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.43	2.48	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.58	3.19	+1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.44	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.02	6.08	+6.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.59	16.09	+20.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRA.TO vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the CMDY Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRA.TO and CMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRA.TO	CMDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.43	2.48	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.12	0.96	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.70	-0.15

Drawdowns

PRA.TO vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRA.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.43%, which is greater than CMDY's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRA.TO and CMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRA.TO	CMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.43%	-23.61%	-10.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.26%	-6.43%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.47%	-10.73%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.37%	-21.68%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-2.57%	+0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.71%	-9.57%	+1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	2.42%	-1.26%

Volatility

PRA.TO vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) is 3.79%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that PRA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRA.TO	CMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.79%	5.22%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.45%	13.82%	-4.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.40%	15.75%	-3.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.47%	14.46%	-0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.41%	13.35%	+1.06%

Dividends

PRA.TO vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

PRA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than CMDY's 10.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF	10.28%	12.89%	4.23%	5.10%	3.98%	16.09%	0.15%	2.21%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRA.TO Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund	2.09%	3.23%	2.95%	3.12%	1.93%	1.25%	1.52%	1.57%	1.77%	1.55%	1.64%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRA.TO and CMDY in my portfolio?

PRA.TO and CMDY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.