PRA.TO vs. XIC.TO
PRA.TO (Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund) and XIC.TO (iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRA.TO is a fund fund, while XIC.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Over the past 10 years, PRA.TO returned 10.80%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for XIC.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRA.TO achieves a 24.32% return, which is significantly higher than XIC.TO's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PRA.TO has underperformed XIC.TO with an annualized return of 10.80%, while XIC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.
PRA.TO
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 24.32%
- 6M
- 24.16%
- 1Y
- 42.26%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
XIC.TO
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- 1Y
- 34.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.62%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
PRA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRA.TO Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund | 24.32% | 18.21% | 8.78% | 2.07% | 15.88% | 23.55% | 5.06% | 14.16% | -7.41% | 3.51% |
XIC.TO iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 10.75% | 31.51% | 21.48% | 11.73% | -5.82% | 23.42% | 5.61% | 22.76% | -8.72% | 8.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRA.TO and XIC.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2013 | 0.37 |
The correlation between PRA.TO and XIC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PRA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRA.TO
XIC.TO
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
PRA.TO
XIC.TO
Energy
PRA.TO
XIC.TO
Utilities
PRA.TO
XIC.TO
Real Estate
PRA.TO
XIC.TO
Consumer Defensive
PRA.TO
XIC.TO
Industrials
PRA.TO
XIC.TO
Communication Services
PRA.TO
-
XIC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
PRA.TO
-
XIC.TO
Financial Services
PRA.TO
-
XIC.TO
Healthcare
PRA.TO
-
XIC.TO
Technology
PRA.TO
-
XIC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRA.TO vs. XIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PRA.TO
XIC.TO
PRA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRA.TO | XIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.50 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.02 | 3.76 | +9.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.59 | 17.44 | +19.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRA.TO | XIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43 | 2.76 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.54 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
PRA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRA.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.43%, smaller than the maximum XIC.TO drawdown of -48.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRA.TO and XIC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRA.TO | XIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.43% | -48.21% | +13.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.26% | -9.29% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.47% | -12.27% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.37% | -16.24% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.26% | -37.21% | +4.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -1.05% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -7.04% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 2.00% | -0.84% |
Volatility
PRA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) at 3.48%. This indicates that PRA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRA.TO | XIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 3.48% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 10.33% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.40% | 12.67% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 13.13% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 14.96% | -0.55% |
Dividends
PRA.TO vs. XIC.TO - Dividend Comparison
PRA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than XIC.TO's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRA.TO Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund | 2.09% | 3.23% | 2.95% | 3.12% | 1.93% | 1.25% | 1.52% | 1.57% | 1.77% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 2.09% |
XIC.TO iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.02% | 2.23% | 2.64% | 2.95% | 3.10% | 2.44% | 3.03% | 3.01% | 3.19% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRA.TO and XIC.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PRA.TO and XIC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer