PR1Z.DE vs. XB4A.DE
PR1Z.DE (Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)) and XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - PR1Z.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap while XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PR1Z.DE returned 11.54%/yr vs 18.13%/yr for XB4A.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PR1Z.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XB4A.DE.
Performance
PR1Z.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PR1Z.DE achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 24.55% return.
PR1Z.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 7.42%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 21.13%
- YTD
- 24.55%
- 1Y
- 49.11%
- 3Y*
- 31.51%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
PR1Z.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR1Z.DE Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) | 11.77% | 24.78% | 9.45% | 19.41% | -12.44% | 27.38% | -4.63% | 22.47% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 24.55% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 11.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PR1Z.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PR1Z.DE and XB4A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PR1Z.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PR1Z.DE
XB4A.DE
PR1Z.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PR1Z.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.47 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 4.49 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | 15.21 | -6.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PR1Z.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PR1Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.55%, smaller than the maximum XB4A.DE drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1Z.DE and XB4A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PR1Z.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -53.54% | +13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.31% | -10.88% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.67% | -16.26% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.21% | -32.50% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -2.05% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -9.88% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.22% | -0.46% |
Volatility
PR1Z.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE) is 4.03%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that PR1Z.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PR1Z.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 4.80% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.60% | 14.89% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.77% | 17.61% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 19.15% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 20.14% | -1.49% |
PR1Z.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PR1Z.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PR1Z.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison
PR1Z.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, while XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR1Z.DE Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) | 2.26% | 2.53% | 2.77% | 2.80% | 3.09% | 1.83% | 2.11% | 2.60% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PR1Z.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PR1Z.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1Z.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
PR1Z.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PR1Z.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
Find the right allocation for PR1Z.DE and XB4A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer