PQTSX vs. ^TNX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PQTSX (PGIM TIPS Fund) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while ^TNX (Treasury Yield 10 Years) is an index. Over the past 5 years, PQTSX returned 0.86%/yr vs 22.98%/yr for ^TNX. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQTSX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than ^TNX's 7.49% return.

PQTSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: 3.72%
• 5Y*: 0.86%
• 10Y*: —

^TNX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 9.52%
• 1Y: 0.29%
• 3Y*: 6.63%
• 5Y*: 22.98%
• 10Y*: 10.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQTSX PGIM TIPS Fund	1.83%	6.58%	1.74%	2.34%	-13.56%	7.91%	10.20%	8.19%	-1.64%	0.92%
^TNX Treasury Yield 10 Years	7.49%	-8.97%	18.29%	-0.34%	156.55%	64.89%	-52.21%	-28.56%	11.68%	-1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PQTSX and ^TNX is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	-0.70

The correlation between PQTSX and ^TNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.81 (3 years) to -0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PQTSX vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQTSX

PQTSX Risk / Return Rank: 28
PQTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
PQTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
PQTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PQTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PQTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

^TNX

^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 12
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PQTSX	^TNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.09	+1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	0.23	+1.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.03	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	0.09	+2.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.11	0.17	+7.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQTSX and ^TNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PQTSX	^TNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	0.09	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.71	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	-0.02	+0.44

Drawdowns

PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQTSX drawdown since its inception was -16.40%, smaller than the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -93.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTSX and ^TNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQTSX	^TNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.40%	-93.78%	+77.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.23%	-12.35%	+10.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.53%	-27.41%	+22.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.40%	-27.41%	+11.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-84.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.67%	-44.22%	+41.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-51.35%	+46.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	6.96%	-6.28%

Volatility

PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) is 1.57%, while Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that PQTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQTSX	^TNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.57%	5.23%	-3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.81%	10.75%	-7.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82%	15.54%	-11.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.34%	32.50%	-26.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.68%	48.04%	-42.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQTSX and ^TNX in my portfolio?

PQTSX and ^TNX have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PQTSX or ^TNX?

^TNX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to PQTSX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTSX dropped -16.40% vs ^TNX's -93.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.