PQTSX vs. ^TNX
PQTSX (PGIM TIPS Fund) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while ^TNX (Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index) is an index. Over the past 5 years, PQTSX returned 0.71%/yr vs 24.75%/yr for ^TNX. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQTSX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than ^TNX's 7.93% return.
PQTSX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- —
^TNX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 6.31%
- 5Y*
- 24.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQTSX PGIM TIPS Fund | 0.61% | 6.58% | 1.74% | 2.34% | -13.56% | 7.91% | 10.20% | 8.19% | -1.64% | 0.92% |
^TNX Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index | 7.93% | -8.97% | 18.29% | -0.34% | 156.55% | 64.89% | -52.21% | -28.56% | 11.68% | -1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQTSX and ^TNX is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | -0.70 |
The correlation between PQTSX and ^TNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQTSX vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank
PQTSX
^TNX
PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) and Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PQTSX | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.05 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 0.34 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 0.61 | +4.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQTSX drawdown since its inception was -16.40%, smaller than the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -96.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTSX and ^TNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQTSX | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | -96.85% | +80.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | -11.94% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.53% | -27.41% | +22.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.40% | -27.41% | +11.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -84.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -71.64% | +67.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -55.01% | +50.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 6.58% | -5.88% |
Volatility
PQTSX vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) is 1.73%, while Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that PQTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQTSX | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 3.57% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 10.72% | -7.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81% | 15.13% | -11.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 32.21% | -25.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.67% | 47.88% | -42.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQTSX and ^TNX have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^TNX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to PQTSX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTSX dropped -16.40% vs ^TNX's -96.85%.
PQTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PQTSX and ^TNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer