PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQTSX vs. PZRMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQTSX vs. PZRMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) and PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQTSX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than PZRMX's 4.89% return.


PQTSX

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.52%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*

PZRMX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
4.89%
6M
4.65%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
7.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQTSX vs. PZRMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQTSX
PGIM TIPS Fund
0.13%6.58%1.74%2.34%-13.56%7.91%10.20%8.19%-1.64%0.92%
PZRMX
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund
4.89%16.18%12.47%5.95%-5.42%13.22%8.92%10.42%-4.05%7.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PQTSX and PZRMX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.50

The correlation between PQTSX and PZRMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQTSX vs. PZRMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQTSX
PQTSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PQTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PZRMX
PZRMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PZRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PZRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQTSX vs. PZRMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) and PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQTSXPZRMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.42

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

4.03

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

14.26

-9.81

PQTSX vs. PZRMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQTSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the PZRMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQTSX and PZRMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQTSX vs. PZRMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQTSX drawdown since its inception was -16.40%, smaller than the maximum PZRMX drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTSX and PZRMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQTSXPZRMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.40%

-19.71%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-3.35%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

-4.96%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.40%

-14.57%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-2.95%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-4.58%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.94%

-0.24%

Volatility

PQTSX vs. PZRMX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) at 1.60%. This indicates that PQTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZRMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQTSXPZRMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

1.60%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

4.79%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

6.05%

-2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.33%

8.35%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.67%

7.55%

-1.88%

PQTSX vs. PZRMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQTSX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PZRMX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQTSX vs. PZRMX - Dividend Comparison

PQTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, less than PZRMX's 8.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PQTSX
PGIM TIPS Fund
5.12%4.95%4.39%3.25%6.51%9.54%2.60%2.48%3.26%1.11%0.00%0.00%
PZRMX
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund
8.36%2.35%9.84%0.00%13.86%11.20%0.54%2.56%11.15%6.06%0.16%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQTSX and PZRMX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PQTSX has higher volatility (1.80%) compared to PZRMX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTSX dropped -16.40% vs PZRMX's -19.71%.

PZRMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQTSX and PZRMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer